Skip to main content
Original Article

Assessing Need for Cognition in Early Adolescence

Validation of a German Adaption of the Cacioppo/Petty Scale

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000170

Need for cognition (NFC) refers to “the (enduring) tendency for an individual to engage in and enjoy effortful analytic activity” (Cacioppo & Petty, 1982, p. 116). Yet, NFC has predominantly been assessed in adults. I present a 19-item German NFC scale for children of 10 years and older. 745 secondary-school students were assessed three times in grades 5 and 6 with measures of NFC, intelligence, achievement, and motivational variables. The scale showed good psychometric properties, validity, and suitability for longitudinal research. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a one-dimensional conceptualization of NFC and the need for method factors for the effects of item wording, which were systematically related to students’ ability, achievement, and motivation.

References

  • Bless, H. , Wänke, M. , Bohner, G. , Fellhauer, R. F. , Schwartz, N. (1994). Need for Cognition: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben [Need for Cognition: A scale for the assessment of engagement and enjoyment of thinking]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 147–154. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bors, D. A. , Vigneau, F. , Lalande, F. (2006). Measuring the need for cognition: Item polarity, dimensionality and the relation with ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 819–828. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T. , & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T. , Petty, R. E. , Feinstein, J. A. , Jarvis, B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Day, E. A. , Espejo, J. , Kowollik, V. , Boatman, P. R. , McEntire, L. (2007). Modeling the links between need for cognition and the acquisition of a complex skill. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 201–212. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Elliot, A. J. , & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Enders, C. K. , & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Forsterlee, R. , & Ho, R. (1999). An examination of the short form of the need for cognition scale applied in an Australian sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 471–480. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ginet, A. , Py, J. (2000). Le besoin de cognition: Une échelle française pour enfants et ses conséquences au plan sociocognitif [The need for cognition: A French scale for children]. L’Année Psychologique, 100, 585–627. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heller, K. A. , & Perleth, C. (2000). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision (KFT 4–12+R) [Cognitive ability test for class level 4 to 12, revised version]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Inzlicht, M. , Schmader, T. (2011). Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application. New York: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McArdle, J. J. , & Grimm, K. J. (2010). Five steps in latent curve and latent change score modeling with longitudinal data. In K. van Montfort, A. Satorra, J. H. Oud, (Eds.), Longitudinal research with latent variables (pp. 245–273). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meredith, W. , Horn, J. (2001). The role of factorial invariance in modeling growth and change. In L. M. Collins, A. G. Sayer, (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 203–240). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mussel, P. (2010). Epistemic curiosity and related constructs: Lacking evidence of discriminant validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 506–510. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. , & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus Version 6.1 [statistical software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pekrun, R. , Hofe, R. v. , Blum, W. , Goetz, T. , Wartha, S. , Frenzel, A. , & Jullien, S. (2006). Projekt zur Analyse der Leistungsentwicklung in Mathematik (PALMA) – Entwicklungsverläufe, Schülervoraussetzungen und Kontextbedingungen von Mathematikleistungen in der Sekundarstufe I [Project for the longitudinal analysis of mathematics achievement (PALMA): Development, predictors, and context factors of math achievement in secondary school]. In M. Prenzel, L. Allolio-Näcke, (Eds.), Untersuchungen zur Bildungsqualität von Schule. Abschlussbericht des DFG-Schwerpunktprogramms (pp. 21–53). Münster, Germany: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M. , MacKenzie, S. M. , Lee, J. , Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Preckel, F. , Holling, H. , Vock, M. (2006). Academic underachievement: Relationship with cognitive motivation, achievement motivation, and conscientiousness. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 401–411. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Preckel, F. , Lipnevich, A. A. , Boehme, K. , Brandner, L. , Georgi, K. , Könen, T. , ... Roberts, R. D. (2012). Morningness-eveningness and educational outcomes: The lark has an advantage over the owl at high school. British Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02059.x First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Quilty, L. C. , Oakman, J. M. , Risko, E. (2006). Correlates of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale method effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 99–117. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rauch, W. A. , Schweizer, K. , Moosbrugger, H. (2007). Method effects due to social desirability as a parsimonious explanation of the deviation from unidimensionality in LOT-R scores. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1597–1607. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Richardson, M. , Abraham, C. , Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 35–387. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schweizer, K. (2010). Some guidelines concerning the modeling of traits and abilities in test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 1–2. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Souvignier, E. , Trenk-Hinterberger, I. , Adam-Schwebe, S. , Gold, A. (2008). Frankfurter Leseverständnistest für 5. und 6. Klassen [Frankfurt test of reading comprehension for grades 5 and 6]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Thorndike, R. L. , & Hagen, E. (1971). Cognitive abilities test. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar