Assessing Need for Cognition in Early Adolescence
Validation of a German Adaption of the Cacioppo/Petty Scale
Abstract
Need for cognition (NFC) refers to “the (enduring) tendency for an individual to engage in and enjoy effortful analytic activity” (Cacioppo & Petty, 1982, p. 116). Yet, NFC has predominantly been assessed in adults. I present a 19-item German NFC scale for children of 10 years and older. 745 secondary-school students were assessed three times in grades 5 and 6 with measures of NFC, intelligence, achievement, and motivational variables. The scale showed good psychometric properties, validity, and suitability for longitudinal research. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a one-dimensional conceptualization of NFC and the need for method factors for the effects of item wording, which were systematically related to students’ ability, achievement, and motivation.
References
1994). Need for Cognition: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben [
(Need for Cognition: A scale for the assessment of engagement and enjoyment of thinking ]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 147–154.2006). Measuring the need for cognition: Item polarity, dimensionality and the relation with ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 819–828.
(1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.
(1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253.
(2007). Modeling the links between need for cognition and the acquisition of a complex skill. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 201–212.
(2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.
(2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138.
(1999). An examination of the short form of the need for cognition scale applied in an Australian sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 471–480.
(2000). Le besoin de cognition: Une échelle française pour enfants et ses conséquences au plan sociocognitif [
(The need for cognition: A French scale for children ]. L’Année Psychologique, 100, 585–627.2000). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision (KFT 4–12+R) [
(Cognitive ability test for class level 4 to 12, revised version ]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.2011). Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application. New York: Oxford University Press.
(2010). Five steps in latent curve and latent change score modeling with longitudinal data. In , Longitudinal research with latent variables (pp. 245–273). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
(2001). The role of factorial invariance in modeling growth and change. In , New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 203–240). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(2010). Epistemic curiosity and related constructs: Lacking evidence of discriminant validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 506–510.
(1998–2010). Mplus Version 6.1 [statistical software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
(2006). Projekt zur Analyse der Leistungsentwicklung in Mathematik (PALMA) – Entwicklungsverläufe, Schülervoraussetzungen und Kontextbedingungen von Mathematikleistungen in der Sekundarstufe I [
(Project for the longitudinal analysis of mathematics achievement (PALMA): Development, predictors, and context factors of math achievement in secondary school ]. In , Untersuchungen zur Bildungsqualität von Schule. Abschlussbericht des DFG-Schwerpunktprogramms (pp. 21–53). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.2003). Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
(2006). Academic underachievement: Relationship with cognitive motivation, achievement motivation, and conscientiousness. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 401–411.
(2012). Morningness-eveningness and educational outcomes: The lark has an advantage over the owl at high school. British Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02059.x
(2006). Correlates of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale method effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 99–117.
(2007). Method effects due to social desirability as a parsimonious explanation of the deviation from unidimensionality in LOT-R scores. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1597–1607.
(2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 35–387.
(2010). Some guidelines concerning the modeling of traits and abilities in test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 1–2.
(2008). Frankfurter Leseverständnistest für 5. und 6. Klassen [
(Frankfurt test of reading comprehension for grades 5 and 6 ]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.1971). Cognitive abilities test. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
(