Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000475

Abstract. The Teacher Self-Efficacy Scale (TSES) is a widely accepted and enthusiastically used measurement instrument. Unfortunately, little firm evidence is available to support its factorial structure. The article reports on the results of the TSES administered to large representative samples of primary (2,083) and lower-secondary school teachers (2,382) in Poland, along with the results of reanalyzed US data, based on which the scale was developed. The results support TSES as a reliable instrument applicable across countries. However, they also highlight the importance of analyzing the factorial structure of the scale with each application, as it may require modifications when administered to different samples. Additionally, moderate evidence was found in Polish data for TSES to be invariant between primary and lower-secondary school teachers.

References

  • Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Scribner, J. P. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries. Educational Researcher, 36, 369–387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07308739 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Aloe, A. M., Amo, L. C., & Shanahan, M. E. (2014). Classroom management self-efficacy and burnout: A multivariate meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9244-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, R. N. (1988). Relationships among teachers’ and students’ thinking skills, sense of efficacy, and student achievement. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 34, 148–165. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Armor, D., Conroy-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascal, A., … Zellman, G. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading programs in selected Los Angeles minority schools. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Armstrong, J. S. (1967). Derivation of theory by means of factor analysis or Tom Swift and his electric factor analysis machine. The American Statistician, 21, 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1967.10479849 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Betoret, F. D. (2006). Stressors, self-efficacy, coping resources, and burnout among secondary school teachers in Spain. Educational Psychology, 26, 519–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500342492 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Core self-evaluations: A review of the trait and its role in job satisfaction and job performance. European Journal of Personality, 17, S5–S18. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.481 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boomsma, A. (2000). Reporting analyses of covariance structures. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 461–483. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0703_6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bosma, T., Hessels, M., & Resing, W. (2012). Teachers’ preferences for educational planning: Dynamic testing, teaching’ experience and teachers’ sense of efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 560–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Çapa, Y., Çakıroğlu, J., & Sarıkaya, H. (2005). The development and validatian of a Turkish version of the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale. Education and Science, 30, 74–81. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Steca, P. (2003). Efficacy beliefs as determinants of teachers’ job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 821–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.821 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., Petitta, L., & Rubinacci, A. (2003). Teachers’, school staff’s and parents’ efficacy beliefs as determinants of attitudes toward school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173601 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Central Statistical Office. (2012). Tabl. 3(238). In Education in 2011/12 School Year (Statistical Information and Elaborations) Warsaw. Retrieved from http://stat.gov.pl/download/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultaktualnosci/5488/1/10/1/calosc_oiw_2011_2012.zip First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 323–337. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dolata, R., Hawrot, A., Humenny, G., Jasińska, A., Koniewski, M., Majkut, P., & i Żółtak, T. (2013). Trafność metody edukacyjnej wartości dodanej dla gimnazjów [Validity of Educational Value-Added method for lower-secondary schools]. Warsaw, Poland: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dolata, R., Hawrot, A., Humenny, G., Jasińska-Maciążek, A., Koniewski, M., Majkut, P., … Otręba-Szklarczyk, A. (2015). (Ko)warianty efektywności nauczania. Wyniki badania w klasach IV-VI [(Ko)wariants of teaching effectiveness. Results of a study among 4th–6th graders]. Warsaw, Poland: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Doornik, J. A., & Hansen, H. (2008). An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70, 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00537.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duffin, L., French, B., & Patrick, H. (2012). The Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale: Confirming the factor structure with beginning pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 827–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.03.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Evers, W., Tomic, W., & Brouwers, A. (2005). Does equity sensitivity moderate the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs and teacher burnout? Representative Research in Social Psychology, 28, 35–46. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Friedman, I. A., & Kass, E. (2002). Teacher self-efficacy: A classroom-organization conceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 675–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00027-6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garvis, S. (2013). Beginning generalist teacher self-efficacy for music compared with Maths and English. British Journal of Music Education, 30, 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051712000411 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbs, S., & Powell, B. (2012). Teacher efficacy and pupil behaviour: The structure of teachers’ individual and collective beliefs and their relationship with numbers of pupils excluded from school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 564–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02046.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033003003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gregorich, S. (2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Medical Care. Special Issue: Measurement in a Multi-Ethnic Society, 44, 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245454.12228.8f First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Guo, Y., Connor, C. M., Yang, Y., Roehrig, A. D., & Morrison, F. J. (2012). The effects of teacher qualification, teacher self-efficacy, and classroom practices on fifth graders’ literacy outcomes. The Elementary School Journal, 113, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1086/665816 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gür, G., Çakiroglu, J., & Çapa Aydin, Y. (2012). Investigating predictors of sense of efficacy beliefs of classroom, science, and mathematics teachers. Education and Science, 37, 68–76. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heneman, H., Kimball, S., & Milanowski, A. (2006). The Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale: Validation evidence and behavioral prediction (Working Paper No. 2006-7). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Henson, R. K. (2002). From adolescent angst to adulthood: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas in the development of teacher efficacy research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3703_1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henson, R. K., Kogan, L. R., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2001). A reliability generalization study of the teacher efficacy scale and related instruments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 404–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640121971284 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henze, N., & Zirkler, B. (1990). A class of invariant consistent tests for multivariate normality. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 19, 3595–3617. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929008830400 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holzberger, D., Philipp, A., & Kunter, M. (2013). How Teachers’ Self-Efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032198 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. (1937). The bi-factor method. Psychometrika, 2, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287965 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoover-Dempsey, K. V. (1992). Explorations in parent-school relations. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1992.9941128 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional Criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huber, P. J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In L. M. Le CamJ. NeymanEds., Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (pp. 221–233). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jennrich, R. I., & Sampson, P. F. (1966). Rotation for simple loadings. Psychometrika, 31, 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289465 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kılınç, A., Kartal, T., Eroglu, B., Demiral, Ü., Afacan, Ö., Polat, D., … Görgülü, Ö. (2013). Preservice science teachers’ efficacy regarding a socioscientific issue: A Belief system approach. Research in Science Education, 43, 2455–2475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9368-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klassen, R., Bong, M., Usher, E., Har Chong, W., Huan, V., Wong, I., & Georgiou, G. (2009). Exploring the validity of a teachers’ self-efficacy scale in five countries. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.08.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klassen, R., Tze, V., Betts, S., & Gordon, K. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9141-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. D., & Slegers, D. W. (2005). Factor analysis: Multiple groups. In B. EverittD. HowellEds., Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (pp. 617–623). Chichester, UK: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self- and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.247 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mohamadi, F. S., & Asadzadeh, H. (2012). Testing the mediating role of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs in the relationship between sources of efficacy information and students achievement. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 13, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9203-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moolenaar, N. M., Sleegers, P. J. C., & Daly, A. J. (2012). Teaming up: Linking collaboration networks, collective efficacy, and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mueller, R., & Hancock, G. (2008). Best practices in structural equation modeling. In J. W. OsborneEd., Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 488–510). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, B. O., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00832.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 267–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/271070 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pan, Y. H. (2013). Relationships among teachers’ self-efficacy and students’ motivation, atmosphere, and satisfaction in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 33, 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2013-0069 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328031US0201_02 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 114, 68–77. https://doi.org/10.2466/14.02.PR0.114k14w0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2000). Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: The relationships between job satisfaction, sense of efficacy and teachers’ extra-role behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 649–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00012-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, J., Roehrig, A. D., Hensler, B. S., Connor, C. M., & Schatschneider, C. (2010). Teacher quality moderates the genetic effects on early reading. Science, 328, 512–514. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186149 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tobin, T. J., Muller, R. O., & Turner, L. M. (2006). Organizational learning and climate as predictors of selfefficacy. Social Psychology of Education, 9, 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-005-4790-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tournaki, N., & Podell, D. M. (2005). The impact of student characteristics and teacher efficacy on teachers’ predictions of student success. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, H., Hall, N. C., & Rahimi, S. (2015). Self-efficacy and causal attributions in teachers: Effects on burnout, job satisfaction, illness, and quitting intentions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–830. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wolters, Ch. A., & Daugherty, S. G. (2007). Goal structures and teachers’ sense of efficacy: Their relation and association to teaching experience and academic level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.181 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yu, X., Wang, P., Zhai, X., Dai, H., & Yang, Q. (2015). The effect of work stress on job burnout among teachers: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Social Indicators Research, 122, 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0716-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86, 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar