The Teacher Self-Efficacy Scale (TSES) Factorial Structure Evidence Review and New Evidence From Polish-Speaking Samples
Abstract
Abstract. The Teacher Self-Efficacy Scale (TSES) is a widely accepted and enthusiastically used measurement instrument. Unfortunately, little firm evidence is available to support its factorial structure. The article reports on the results of the TSES administered to large representative samples of primary (2,083) and lower-secondary school teachers (2,382) in Poland, along with the results of reanalyzed US data, based on which the scale was developed. The results support TSES as a reliable instrument applicable across countries. However, they also highlight the importance of analyzing the factorial structure of the scale with each application, as it may require modifications when administered to different samples. Additionally, moderate evidence was found in Polish data for TSES to be invariant between primary and lower-secondary school teachers.
References
2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries. Educational Researcher, 36, 369–387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07308739
(2014). Classroom management self-efficacy and burnout: A multivariate meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9244-0
(1988). Relationships among teachers’ and students’ thinking skills, sense of efficacy, and student achievement. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 34, 148–165.
(1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading programs in selected Los Angeles minority schools. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
(1967). Derivation of theory by means of factor analysis or Tom Swift and his electric factor analysis machine. The American Statistician, 21, 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1967.10479849
(1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
(2006). Stressors, self-efficacy, coping resources, and burnout among secondary school teachers in Spain. Educational Psychology, 26, 519–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500342492
(2003). Core self-evaluations: A review of the trait and its role in job satisfaction and job performance. European Journal of Personality, 17, S5–S18. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.481
(2000). Reporting analyses of covariance structures. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 461–483. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0703_6
(2012). Teachers’ preferences for educational planning: Dynamic testing, teaching’ experience and teachers’ sense of efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 560–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.007
(2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2005). The development and validatian of a Turkish version of the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale. Education and Science, 30, 74–81.
(2003). Efficacy beliefs as determinants of teachers’ job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 821–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.821
(2003). Teachers’, school staff’s and parents’ efficacy beliefs as determinants of attitudes toward school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173601
(2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001
(2012). Tabl. 3(238). In Education in 2011/12 School Year (Statistical Information and Elaborations) Warsaw. Retrieved from http://stat.gov.pl/download/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultaktualnosci/5488/1/10/1/calosc_oiw_2011_2012.zip
. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 323–337.
(2013). Trafność metody edukacyjnej wartości dodanej dla gimnazjów
([Validity of Educational Value-Added method for lower-secondary schools] . Warsaw, Poland: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.2015). (Ko)warianty efektywności nauczania. Wyniki badania w klasach IV-VI
([(Ko)wariants of teaching effectiveness. Results of a study among 4th–6th graders] . Warsaw, Poland: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.2008). An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70, 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00537.x
(2012). The Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale: Confirming the factor structure with beginning pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 827–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.03.004
(2005). Does equity sensitivity moderate the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs and teacher burnout? Representative Research in Social Psychology, 28, 35–46.
(1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299.
(2002). Teacher self-efficacy: A classroom-organization conceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 675–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00027-6
(2013). Beginning generalist teacher self-efficacy for music compared with Maths and English. British Journal of Music Education, 30, 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051712000411
(2012). Teacher efficacy and pupil behaviour: The structure of teachers’ individual and collective beliefs and their relationship with numbers of pupils excluded from school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 564–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02046.x
(1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569
(2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033003003
(2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Medical Care. Special Issue: Measurement in a Multi-Ethnic Society, 44, 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245454.12228.8f
(2012). The effects of teacher qualification, teacher self-efficacy, and classroom practices on fifth graders’ literacy outcomes. The Elementary School Journal, 113, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1086/665816
(2012). Investigating predictors of sense of efficacy beliefs of classroom, science, and mathematics teachers. Education and Science, 37, 68–76.
(2006). The Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale: Validation evidence and behavioral prediction (Working Paper No. 2006-7). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
(2002). From adolescent angst to adulthood: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas in the development of teacher efficacy research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3703_1
(2001). A reliability generalization study of the teacher efficacy scale and related instruments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 404–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640121971284
(1990). A class of invariant consistent tests for multivariate normality. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 19, 3595–3617. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929008830400
(2013). How Teachers’ Self-Efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032198
(1937). The bi-factor method. Psychometrika, 2, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287965
(1992). Explorations in parent-school relations. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1992.9941128
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional Criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
(1967).
(The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions . In L. M. Le CamJ. NeymanEds., Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (pp. 221–233). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.1966). Rotation for simple loadings. Psychometrika, 31, 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289465
(1970). A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817
(2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2013). Preservice science teachers’ efficacy regarding a socioscientific issue: A Belief system approach. Research in Science Education, 43, 2455–2475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9368-8
(2009). Exploring the validity of a teachers’ self-efficacy scale in five countries. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.08.001
(2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9141-8
(2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2005).
(Factor analysis: Multiple groups . In B. EverittD. HowellEds., Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (pp. 617–623). Chichester, UK: Wiley.1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
(2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82.
(1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825
(1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self- and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.247
(2012). Testing the mediating role of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs in the relationship between sources of efficacy information and students achievement. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 13, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9203-8
(2012). Teaming up: Linking collaboration networks, collective efficacy, and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.001
(2008).
(Best practices in structural equation modeling . In J. W. OsborneEd., Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 488–510). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00832.x
(1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 267–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/271070
(1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
(2013). Relationships among teachers’ self-efficacy and students’ motivation, atmosphere, and satisfaction in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 33, 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2013-0069
(2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328031US0201_02
(2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x
(1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
(2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192
(2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y
(2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 114, 68–77. https://doi.org/10.2466/14.02.PR0.114k14w0
(2000). Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: The relationships between job satisfaction, sense of efficacy and teachers’ extra-role behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 649–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00012-3
(2010). Teacher quality moderates the genetic effects on early reading. Science, 328, 512–514. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186149
(2006). Organizational learning and climate as predictors of selfefficacy. Social Psychology of Education, 9, 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-005-4790-z
(2005). The impact of student characteristics and teacher efficacy on teachers’ predictions of student success. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.003
(2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
(1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202
(2015). Self-efficacy and causal attributions in teachers: Effects on burnout, job satisfaction, illness, and quitting intentions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.005
(1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–830. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934
(2007). Goal structures and teachers’ sense of efficacy: Their relation and association to teaching experience and academic level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.181
(2015). The effect of work stress on job burnout among teachers: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Social Indicators Research, 122, 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0716-5
(2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86, 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
(