Forecasting the Primary Dimension of Social Perception
Symbolic and Realistic Threats Together Predict Warmth in the Stereotype Content Model
Abstract
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) posits two fundamental dimensions of intergroup perception, warmth and competence, predicted by socio-structural dimensions of competition and status, respectively. However, the SCM has been challenged on claiming perceived competition as the socio-structural dimension that predicts perceived warmth. The current research improves by broadening warmth’s predictor (competition) to include both realistic and symbolic threat from Integrated Threat Theory (Study 1). We also measure two components of the warmth dimension: sociability and morality. Study 2 tests new items to measure both threat and warmth. The new threat items significantly improve prediction of warmth, compared with standard SCM items. Morality and sociability correlate highly and do not differ much in their predictability by competition/threat.
References
2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763.
(2013). A contextual approach to stereotype content model: Stereotype contents in context. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 440–444. (World Conference on Psychology and Sociology 2012)
(2013). Kalıpyargı İçeriği Modeline Sosyal Bağlamsal Bir Yaklaşım: Bağlam İçinde Kalıpyargı İçerikleri
([A contextual approach to stereotype content model: Stereotype contents in context] . Türk Psikoloji Yazilari, 16, 15–35. [English abstract].1991). Thinking about people: Contributions of a typological alternative to associationistic and dimensional models of person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 203–217.
(1996). Violating American values: A “value congruence” approach to understanding outgroup attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 387–410.
(2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135–143.
(2010). The effects of status on perceived warmth and competence: Malleability of the relationship between status and stereotype content. Social Psychology, 41, 82–87.
(2013). Morality and intergroup relations: Threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 811–821.
(2012). You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 149–166.
(in press ). Compensation in intergroup relations: An investigation on its structural and strategic foundations. The British Journal of Social Psychology. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12067.2009). Social structure shapes cultural stereotypes and emotions: A causal test of the Stereotype Content Model. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 147–155.
(2005). When do the parts add up to the whole? Ambivalent stereotype content for gay male subgroups. Social Cognition, 23, 157–176.
(2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631–648.
(2009). Stereotype content model holds across cultures: Toward universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1–33.
(2005). This old stereotype: The pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 267–285.
(2013). Nations’ income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 726–746.
(2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.
(2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.
(1993). Negative interdependence and prejudice: Whence the affect? In , Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 239–268). New York, NY: Academic Press.
(1999). (Dis)respecting versus (Dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473–489.
(2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuro-imaging responses to extreme outgroups. Psychological Science, 17, 847–853.
(2009). Data analysis: A model comparison approach (2nd edition). New York, NY: Routledge Press.
(2013). Integrating the Stereotype Content Model (warmth and competence) and the Osgood Semantic Differential (evaluation, potency, and activity). European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 673–681.
(1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 414–431.
(2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249.
(1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
(1997). Competence and morality dimensions of national and ethnic stereotypes: A study in six eastern-European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 703–723.
(1999). In-group favouritism and the reflection of realistic dimensions of difference between national states in Central and Eastern European nationality stereotypes. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 85–102.
(1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283–294.
(2008). It’s all relative: Social position and interpersonal perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1193–1201.
(1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.
(1969). Social psychology (Int. Rev. Ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
(2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of blacks and whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1242–1254.
(2003). The role of threat in intergroup relations. In , From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 191–207). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
(1996). Predicting prejudice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 409–426.
(2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In , Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1999). Prejudice toward immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2221–2237.
(1998). Prejudice toward immigrants to Spain and Israel: An integrated threat theory analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 559–576.
(2008). The role of valence in the perception of agency and communion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1073–1082.
(2011). Replications and refinements: Able but unintelligent: Including positively stereotyped black subgroups in the stereotype content model. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 527–530.
(1994). Multiple meanings of behavior: Construing actions in terms of competence or morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 222–232.
(1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1251–1263.
(1994). On the nature of prejudice. Canadian Psychology, 35, 11–23.
(