Skip to main content
Original Article

The Insect-Nonword IAT Revisited

Dissociating Between Evaluative Associations and Recoding

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000220

In 2001, Brendl and colleagues reported a reversed compatibility effect for an insect-nonword Implicit Association Test (IAT), apparently indicating more positive attitudes for insects than for neutral nonwords and therefore calling into question the validity of the IAT. According to a prominent alternative account of IAT effects, this reversed effect reflects task recoding based on salience asymmetries. To disentangle the contributions of associations and recoding, we analyzed data of an insect-nonword IAT with the ReAL model and discovered that (1) recoding is responsible for the unexpected direction of this IAT effect and (2) insects still activated negative associations. Applying the ReAL model helps to avoid misleading interpretations of IAT effects by providing independent estimates for different processes within an IAT.

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 261–295. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brendl, C. M. , Markman, A. B. , & Messner, C. (2001). How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 760–773. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.760 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chang, B. P. I. , & Mitchell, C. (2011). Discriminating between the effects of valence and salience in the Implicit Association Test. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 2251–2275. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.586782 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chang, B. P. I. , & Mitchell, C. J. (2009). Processing fluency as a predictor of salience asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2030–2054. doi: 10.1080/17470210802651737 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chechile, R. A. (2009). Pooling data versus averaging model fits for some prototypical multinomial processing tree models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, 562–576. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2009.06.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Conrey, F. R. , Sherman, J. W. , Gawronski, B. , Hugenberg, K. , & Groom, C. J. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The Quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 469–487. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.469 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Houwer, J. (2001). A structural and process analysis of the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 443–451. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1464 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Houwer, J. (2003). The extrinsic affective Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50, 77–85. doi: 10.1026/1618-3169.50.2.77 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • De Houwer, J. , Geldof, T. , & De Bruycker, E. (2005). The Implicit Association Test as a general measure of similarity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 228–239. doi: 10.1037/h0087478 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H. , Sanbonmatsu, D. M. , Powell, M. C. , & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gast, A. , & Rothermund, K. (2010). When old and frail is not the same: Dissociating category and stimulus effects in four implicit attitude measurement methods. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 479–498. doi: 10.1080/17470210903049963 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. , & Payne, B. K. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. , McGhee, D. E. , & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. , & Nosek, B. A. (2001). Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 85–93. doi: 10.1026/0949-3946.48.2.85 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. , Nosek, B. A. , & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kinoshita, S. , & Peek-O’Leary, M. (2006). Two bases of the compatibility effect in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 2102–2120. doi: 10.1080/17470210500451141 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klauer, K. C. (2006). Hierarchical multinomial processing tree models: A latent-class approach. Psychometrika, 71, 7–31. doi: 10.1007/s11336-004-1188-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klauer, K. C. (2010). Hierarchical multinomial processing tree models: A latent-trait approach. Psychometrika, 75, 70–98. doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9141-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klauer, K. C. , & Mierke, J. (2005). Task-set inertia, attitude accessibility, and compatibility-order effects: New evidence for a task-set switching account of the Implicit Association Test effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 208–217. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271416 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klauer, K. C. , Voss, A. , Schmitz, F. , & Teige-Mocigemba, S. (2007). Process components of the Implicit Association Test: A diffusion-model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 353–368. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.353 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meissner, F. , & Rothermund, K. (2013). Estimating the contributions of associations and recoding in the Implicit Association Test: The ReAL model for the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 45–69. doi: 10.1037/a0030734 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mierke, J. , & Klauer, K. C. (2001). Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 107–122. doi: 10.1026/0949-3946.48.2.107 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Mierke, J. , & Klauer, K. C. (2003). Method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1180–1192. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1180 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mitchell, C. J. (2004). Mere acceptance produces apparent attitude in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 366–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rogers, R. D. , & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rothermund, K. , Teige-Mocigemba, S. , Gast, A. , & Wentura, D. (2009). Minimizing the influence of recoding in the Implicit Association Test: The Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 84–98. doi: 10.1080/17470210701822975 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rothermund, K. , & Wentura, D. (2001). Figure-ground asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 94–106. doi: 10.1026/0949-3946.48.2.94 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Rothermund, K. , & Wentura, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test: Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139–165. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.139 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rothermund, K. , Wentura, D. , & De Houwer, J. (2005). Validity of the salience asymmetry account of the Implicit Association Test: Reply to Greenwald, Nosek, Banaji, and Klauer (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 426–430. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.426 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rouder, J. N. , Lu, J. , Morey, R. D. , Sun, D. , & Speckman, P. L. (2008). A hierarchical process-dissociation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 370–389. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.370 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, J. B. , & Batchelder, W. H. (2008). Assessing individual differences in categorical data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 713–731. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.4.713 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stahl, C. (2006). Multinomiale Verarbeitungsbaummodelle in der Sozialpsychologie [Multinominal processing tree models in social psychology]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 161–171. doi: 10.1024/0044-3514.37.3.161 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Stahl, C. , & Klauer, K. C. (2007). HMMTree: A computer program for latent-class hierarchical multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 267–273. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar