Skip to main content
Research Note

Employees’ Motivation for Personal Initiative

The Joint Influence of Status and Communion Striving

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000089

As organizational contexts are increasingly dynamic, the extent to which employees take initiative to facilitate success has become more important. We examine how employee motivation to get ahead (status striving) and get along with others (communion striving) predicts their proactive work behaviors, in the form of personal initiative, over and above employee accomplishment striving. Data collected from 165 employees indicates status striving has a positive and communion striving has a negative relationship with employee personal initiative. More importantly, the interaction between status and communion striving shows increased employee initiative when both status and communion striving increase from low to high levels. Altogether, our results suggest that employees’ initiative is increased when they are motivated by both getting ahead of and getting along with others at work.

References

  • Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in Western man. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Barrick, M. R. , Stewart, G. L. , Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 43–51. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. F. , Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bindl, U. K. , Parker, S. K. (2010). Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. In S. Zedeck, (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, (Vol. 2, pp. 567–598). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors?. Academy of Management Review, 24, 82–98. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bolino, M. C. , Kacmar, K. M. , Turnley, W. H. , Gilstrap, J. B. (2008). A multi-level review of impression management motives and behaviors. Journal of Management, 34, 1080–1109. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bolino, M. C. , Valcea, S. , Harvey, J. (2010). Employee, manage thyself: The potentially negative implications of expecting employees to behave proactively. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 325–345. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bolino, M. C. , Varela, J. A. , Bande, B. , Turnley, W. H. (2006). The impact of impression-management tactics on supervisor ratings of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 281–297. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bugental, D. B. (2000). Acquisition of the algorithms of social life: A domain-based approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 187–219. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, J. D. , Trapnell, P. D. , Heine, S. J. , Katz, I. M. , Lavallee, L. F. , Lehman, D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 141–156. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chiaburu, D. S. , Marinova, S. V. , Lim, A. S. (2007). Proactive and helping extra-role behaviors: The influence of motives, goal orientation, and social context. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 2282–2293. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chiaburu, D. S. , Oh, I.-S. , Berry, C. M. , Li, N. , Gardner, R. G. (2011). The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1140–1166. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. , Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the social sciences. New York, NY: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 435–462. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Dreu, C. K. W. , Nauta, A. (2009). Self-interest and other-orientation in organizational behavior: Implications for job performance, prosocial behavior, and personal initiative. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 913–926. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fay, D. , Frese, M. (2001). The concept of personal initiative: An overview of validity studies. Human Performance, 14, 97–124. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fay, D. , Sonnentag, S. (2010). A look back to move ahead: New directions for research on proactive performance and other discretionary work behaviours. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 59, 1–20. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fournier, M. A. , Moskowitz, D. S. (2000). The mitigation of interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 827–836. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frese, M. , Fay, D. , Hilburger, T. , Leng, K. , Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 139–161. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frese, M. , Kring, W. , Soose, A. , Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 37–63. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ghaed, S. G. , Gallo, L. C. (2006). Distinctions among agency, communion, and unmitigated agency and communion according to the interpersonal circumplex, five-factor model, and social-emotional correlates. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 77–88. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grant, A. M. , Mayer, D. M. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 900–912. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grant, A. M. , Nurmohamed, S. , Ashford, S. J. , Dekas, K. (2011). The performance implications of ambivalent initiative: The interplay of autonomous and controlled motivations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 241–251. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grant, A. M. , Parker, S. K. (2009). Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. The Academy of Management Annals, 3, 317–375. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grant, A. M. , Parker, S. K. , Collins, C. (2009). Getting credit for proactive behavior: Supervisor reactions depend on what you value and how you feel. Personnel Psychology, 62, 31–55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hennig, K. H. , Walker, L. J. (2008). The darker side of accommodating others: Examining the interpersonal structure of maladaptive constructs. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 2–21. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Helgeson, V. S. , Fritz, H. L. (1999). Unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion: Distinctions from agency and communion. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 131–158. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hogan, J. , Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 100–112. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hogan, R. , Shelton, D. (1998). A socioanalytic perspective on job performance. Human Performance, 12, 129–144. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lindell, M. K. , Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114–121. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oh, I.-S. , Berry, C. M. (2009). The five-factor model of personality and managerial performance: Validity gains through the use of 360 degree performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1498–1513. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ohly, S. , Fritz, C. (2007). Challenging the status quo: What motivates proactive behavior?. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 623–629. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ohly, S. , Fritz, C. (2010). Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity and proactive behavior: A multi-level study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 543–565. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ohly, S. , Sonnentag, S. , Niessen, C. , Zapf, D. (2010). Diary studies in organizational research. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 79–93. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Organ, D. W. , Podsakoff, P. M. , MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parker, S. K. , Bindl, U. K. , Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36, 827–856. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parker, S. K. , Williams, H. M. , Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636–652. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Penney, L. M. , David, E. , Witt, L. A. (2011). A review of personality and performance: Identifying boundaries, contingencies, and future research directions. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 297–310. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M. , MacKenzie, S. B. , Podsakoff, N. P. (2013). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rank, J. , Pace, V. L. , Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 518–528. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. , Dormann, C. , Demerouti, E. (2010). Not all days are created equal: The concept of state work engagement. In A. B. Bakker, M. Leiter, (Eds.), Work engagement: The essential in theory and research (pp. 25–38). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tornau, K. , Frese, M. (2013). Construct clean-up in proactivity research: A meta-analysis on the nomological net of work-related proactivity concepts and their incremental validities. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 62, 44–96. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Dick, R. , van Knippenberg, D. , Kerschreiter, R. , Hertel, G. , Wieseke, J. (2008). Interactive effects of work group and organizational identification on job satisfaction and extra-role behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 388–399. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Dyne, L. , Ellis, J. B. (2004). Job creep: A reactance theory perspective on organizational citizenship behavior as over-fulfillment of obligations. In J. A. M. Coyle-Shapiro, L. M. Shore, M. S. Taylor, L. E. Tetrick, (Eds.), The employment relationship: Examining psychological and contextual perspectives (pp. 181–205). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar