Participative Supervisory Behavior and the Importance of Feeling Safe and Competent to Voice
Abstract
Abstract. In our field study of 147 employees and their supervisors, we tested a moderated mediation model, investigating how participative supervisory behavior relates differently to promotive and prohibitive voice. Overall, we found a significant effect of participative supervisory behavior on promotive and prohibitive voice, and this effect was mediated by psychological safety for prohibitive voice, but not promotive voice. Unexpectedly, we did not find a direct moderation effect of occupational self-efficacy. However, our results suggest that occupational self-efficacy creates a conditional indirect effect for prohibitive voice. Accordingly, our results shed light on the boundary conditions of participative supervisory behavior and illustrate the usefulness of conceptualizing voice as promotive and prohibitive. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
References
(2009).
Speaking up and speaking out: The leadership dynamics of voice in organizations . In J. GreenbergM. S. EdwardsEds., Voice and silence in organizations (pp. 175–202). Bingley, UK: Emerald.(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
(1998). Group size and measures of group-level properties: An examination of eta-squared and ICC values. Journal of Management, 24, 157–172.
(1986).
The wording and translation of research instruments . In W. J. LonnerJ. W. BerryEds., Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: Responses to voice in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 851–875.
(1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471–482.
(2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 40, 869–884.
(2002). Red light, green light: Making sense of the organizational context for issue selling. Organization Science, 13, 355–369.
(1999). Psychological safety and learning behaviors in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.
(2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–188.
(1987).
Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing . In L. L. CummingsB. M. StawEds., Research in organizational behavior (pp. 175–208). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
(1998). Voicing by adapting and innovating employees: An empirical study on how environment and personality interact to affect voice behavior. Human Relations, 51, 945–967.
(2001). From the look of things: Assessing perceptions of organizational dissenters. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 442–470.
(1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853–868.
(2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 71–92.
(2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 189–202.
(2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1453–1476.
(2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 373–412.
(2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 539–569.
(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
(2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.
(2006). Leadership predictors of proactive organizational behavior: Facilitating personal initiative, voice behavior, and exceptional service performance. Graduate School Theses and Dissertations, Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/2669
(2002). Hierarchical Linear Models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(1999). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis, Unpublished Technical Report, University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
(2002). A new occupational self-efficacy scale and its relation to personality constructs and organizational variables. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 219–241.
(2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232.
(1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442–1465.
(2012). Ask and you shall hear (but not always): Examining the relationship between manager consultation and employee voice. Personnel Psychology, 65, 251–282.
(2013). Construct clean-up in proactivity research: A meta-analysis on the nomological net of work-related proactivity concepts and their incremental validities. Applied Psychology, 62, 44–96.
(2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1359–1392.
(1988). The new leadership: Managing participation in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
