Applicants’ Role as (Pro-)Active Agents in the Recruitment and Selection Process

References

• Adams, S., Görgens-Ekermans, G. & De Kock, F. (2018). Graduate applicant intentions and behavioral beliefs: The role of protected group status. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 17, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000210 First citation in articleAbstract, Google Scholar

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Celani, A. & Singh, P. (2011). Signaling theory and applicant attraction outcomes. Personnel Review, 40, 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481111106093 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Cook, M. (2016). Personnel selection: Adding value through people – a changing picture (6th ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Dürr, D. & Klehe, U.-C. (2018). Using the theory of planned behavior to predict faking in selection exercises varying in fidelity. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 17, 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000211 First citation in articleAbstract, Google Scholar

• Farr, J. L.Tippins, N. T. (2017). Handbook of employee selection (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Guion, R. M. (2011). Assessment, measurement, and prediction for personnel decisions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1086/208924 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Ilies, R., Wilson, K. S. & Wagner, D. T. (2009). The spillover of daily job satisfaction onto employees’ family lives: The facilitating role of work-family integration. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 87–102. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.36461938 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• McCarthy, J. M., Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Anderson, N. R., Costa, A. C. & Ahmed, S. M. (2017). Applicant perspectives during selection: A review addressing “so what?”, “what’s new?”, and “where to next?”. Journal of Management, 43, 1693–1725. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316681846 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Nieva, V. & Gutek, B. (1981). Women and work. New York, NY: Praeger. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Proost, K. & Verhaest, D. (2018). Should we tell the recruiter that we value a good work–life balance? Journal of Personnel Psychology, 17, 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000214 First citation in articleAbstract, Google Scholar

• Roulin, N. & Powell, D. M. (2018). Identifying applicant faking in job interviews: Examining the role of criterion-based content analysis and storytelling. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 17, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000207 First citation in articleAbstract, Google Scholar

• Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/208924 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Sirgy, M. J. (1985). Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase motivation. Journal of Business Research, 13, 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(85)90026-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Vrij, A. & Mann, S. (2006). Criteria-based content analysis: An empirical test of its underlying processes. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160500129007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Wille, L., Van Hoye, G., Weijters, B., Rangarajan, D. & Carpentier, M. (2018). To be yourself or to be your ideal self? Outcomes of potential applicants’ actual and ideal self-congruity perceptions. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 17, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000213 First citation in articleAbstract, Google Scholar