Judging Performance – General Mental Ability and the Convergence of Operational Performance Ratings
Abstract
Abstract. This research examined whether general mental ability (GMA) predicts rater convergence with other performance measures in operational performance appraisals (PAs). GMA is consistently related to accurate judgments of others. However, contexts in which these effects have been examined differ from real PA environments. In this study, ratings from managers who also took a GMA test were compared to ratings from other knowledgeable sources (peers, subordinates, self). Ratings from managers with higher GMA converged more with others' evaluations of ratee job performance, with correlations ranging from .15 (peers) to .28 (self), and .30 with a composite across the three sources. These findings establish external validity in support of past research examining the relationship between GMA and PA rating convergence.
References
(1979). Individual differences correlates of accuracy in evaluating others’ performance effectiveness. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 103–115. 10.1177/014662167900300111.
(2005). The good judge revisited: Individual differences in the accuracy of personality judgments. Human Performance, 18, 123–149. 10.1207/s15327043hup1802_2.
(1955). Processes affecting scores on “understanding of others” and “assumed similarity.” Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177–193.
(2018). The profile of the ‘Good Judge’ in HRM: A systematic review, systematic review and agenda for future research. Human Resources Management Review, Advance online publication. 10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.09.003.
(1984). A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 33, 360–396. 10.1016/0030-5073(84)90029-1.
(1999). Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
(1991). Rating ability in performance judgments: The joint influence of implicit theories and intelligence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 300–323. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90024-N.
(1997). Where all the children are above average: The performance appraisal purpose effect. Personnel Psychology, 50, 905–925. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb01487.x.
(2000). The relation of gender, personality, and intelligence to judges' accuracy in judging strangers' personality from brief video segments. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 24, 25–43. 10.1023/A:1006610805385.
(2018). Performance Appraisal and Management. SAGE.
(2005). Psychological testing: Principles and applications (6th ed.). Upper Sadddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
. (2014). ProfileXT technical manual (8th ed.). Waco, TX.
(2011). Conscious rating distortion in performance appraisal: A review, commentary, and proposed framework for research. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 85–95. 10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.013.
