Age and Transformational Leadership
The Roles of Motivation to Lead and Managerial Discretion
Abstract
Abstract: Based on socioemotional selectivity theory, this study examined the indirect relationship between leader’s age and transformational leadership through motivation to lead. This study also investigated managerial discretion as a moderator of the association between age and motivation to lead. A multisourced and two-wave study of 186 Chinese leader–follower dyads shows that leader’s age was indirectly related with transformational leadership through motivation to lead. Managerial discretion moderates the negative age–motivation to lead relationship such that the relationship was significant and negative only for leaders with low managerial discretion. This study provides implications for the management of an increasingly age-diverse workforce and can inform human resource management practices aiming to maximize leadership effectiveness at a later age.
References
1988). Developing transformational leaders: A life span approach. In J. A. CongerR. N. Kanungo (Eds.), Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness (pp. 276–308). Jossey Bass.
(2022). Leadership emergence: An integrative review. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(11), 2069–2100. 10.1037/apl0000997
(2020). Motivation to lead: A meta-analysis and distal-proximal model of motivation and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(4), 331–354. 10.1037/apl0000439
(1997). Taking the charisma out of transformational leadership. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12(3), 689–697.
(2005). Motivation and transactional, charismatic, and transformational leadership: A test of antecedents. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(4), 26–40. 10.1177/107179190501100403
(2007). Effects of gender, education, and age upon leaders' use of influence tactics and full range leadership behaviors. Sex Roles, 56(1), 71–83. 10.1007/s11199-006-9152-6
(2001). Organizational causes and strategic consequences of the extent of top management team replacement during turnaround attempts. Journal of Management Studies, 38(2), 235–270. 10.1111/1467-6486.00235
(1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9–32. 10.1080/135943299398410
(B. M., Bass (Ed.). (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. Free Press.
1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 112–121. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40862298
(2018). Methodological recommendations to move research on work and aging forward. Work, Aging and Retirement, 4(3), 225–237. 10.1093/workar/wax023
(1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7(3), 331–338. 10.1037/0882-7974.7.3.331
(1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. The American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. 10.1037/0003-066x.54.3.165
(2001). Toward a theory of individual differences and leadership: Understanding the motivation to lead. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 481–498. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.481
(China Bureau of Labor Statistics . (2020). [Title not available]. https://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/pcsj/rkpc/7rp/zk/indexce.htm. Accessed 25 August 2022.2011). Differences in managerial discretion across countries: How nation-level institutions affect the degree to which CEOs matter. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8), 797–819. 10.1002/smj.913
(2010). Older worker, different actor? Linking age and emotional labor strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(5), 574–578. 10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.009
(2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. 10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
(2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life's domains. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne, 49(1), 14–23. 10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14
(2021). Generativity at work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 125, Article 103521. 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103521
(2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4) 569–591. 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569
(2020). Motivated to be socially mindful: Explaining age differences in the effect of employees' contact quality with coworkers on their coworker support. Personnel Psychology, 73(3), 407–430. 10.1111/peps.12359
(2018). Age in the entrepreneurial process: The role of future time perspective and prior entrepreneurial experience. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(10), 1067–1085. 10.1037/apl0000322
(2016). The motivation for transformational leadership scale. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(2), 158–180. 10.1108/lodj-05-2014-0086
(1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 369–406.
(2013). Age differences in motivation and stress at work. In C. M. SchlickE. FrielingJ. Wegge (Eds.), Age-differentiated work systems (pp. 119–147). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-642-35057-3_6
(2008). Leading with emotional labor. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(2), 151–168. 10.1108/02683940810850790
(2012). Age-related differences in work motivation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(4), 300–329. 10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02035.x
(2022). Room for leadership? A comparison of perceived managerial job autonomy in public, private and hybrid organizations. International Public Management Journal. Advance online publication.
(2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768. 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
(2004). Aging, adult development, and work motivation. The Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 440–458. 10.5465/amr.2004.13670969
(1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308. 10.2307/2392498
(2007). Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes. The Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 500–528. 10.5465/amr.2007.24351846
(1989). An integrated control theory model of work motivation. The Academy of Management Review, 14(2), 150–172. 10.5465/amr.1989.4282072
(2011). How changes in subjective general health predict future time perspective, and development and generativity motives over the lifespan. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(2), 228–247. 10.1111/j.2044-8325.2010.02012.x
(2011). Age and work-related motives: Results of a meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 197–225. 10.1002/job.665
(2014). Future time perspective and promotion focus as determinants of intraindividual change in work motivation. Psychology and Aging, 29(2), 319–328. 10.1037/a0036768
(2015). Small sample mediation testing: Misplaced confidence in bootstrapped confidence intervals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 194–202. 10.1037/a0036635
(2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125–139. 10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.125
(2005). The relation of job control with job strains: A comparison of multiple data sources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(3), 325–336. 10.1348/096317905x26002
(1991). Goal theory vs. control theory: Contrasting approaches to understanding work motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 9–28. 10.1007/bf00991473
(2018). Line managers and HRM: A managerial discretion perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(2), 255–271. 10.1111/1748-8583.12176
(2013). How do leadership motives affect informal and formal leadership emergence? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(7), 995–1015. 10.1002/job.1836
(2021). Developing the theory and practice of leadership development: A relational view. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(2), Article
(101456 10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.1014561993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 376–390. 10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376
(2012). Mplus 7.1 [Computer program].
(2012). CEO leadership styles and the implementation of organizational diversity practices: Moderating effects of social values and age. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 41–52. 10.1007/s10551-011-0933-7
(2008). Personality and leader effectiveness: A moderated mediation model of leadership self-efficacy, job demands, and job autonomy. The Journal Of applied Psychology, 93(4), 733–743. 10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.733
(2015). The moderating effects of age in the relationships of job autonomy to work outcomes. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1(1), 64–78. 10.1093/workar/wau003
(2008). An introduction to the work and well‐being of older workers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(4), 353–363. 10.1108/02683940810869006
(2018). Aging and occupational health. In K. ShultzG. Adams (Eds.), Aging and work in the 21st century (2nd ed., pp. 213–233). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315167602-10
(2021). Older and less deviant? The paths through emotional labor and organizational cynicism. Work, Aging and Retirement, 7(1), 20–30. 10.1093/workar/waaa017
(2020). Older and less deviant reactions to abusive supervision? A moderated mediation model of age and cognitive reappraisal. Work, Aging and Retirement, 6(3), 195–205. 10.1093/workar/waaa006
(2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 327–340. 10.5465/amj.2006.20786079
(2004). Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(3), 329–354. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.009
(2018). Occupational future time perspective: A meta-analysis of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 229–248. 10.1002/job.2264
(2018). Leadership and generations at work: A critical review. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 44–57. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.09.004
(2013). Within-cohort age-related differences in cognitive functioning. Psychological Science, 24(2), 123–130. 10.1177/0956797612450
(2017). SHRM research overview: Leadership development. https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/special-reports-and-expert-views/Documents/17-0396%20Research%20Overview%20Leadership%20Development%20FNL.pdf
(2020). Getting old at the top: The role of agentic and communal orientations in the relationship between age and follower perceptions of leadership behaviors and outcomes. Work, Aging and Retirement, 6(1), 46–58. 10.1093/workar/waz012
(United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022). Civilian labor force by age, sex, race, and ethnicity. https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/civilian-labor-force-summary.htm
2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–1261. 10.1177/0149206310380462
(2014). Are older leaders less transformational? The role of age for transformational leadership from the perspective of socioemotional selectivity theory [Master’s thesis]. University of Groningen.
(2013). A literature review and emotion-based model of age and leadership: New directions for the trait approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 882–901. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.003
(2011). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & Organization Management, 36(2), 223–270, 10.1177/1059601111401
(2015). Managerial discretion. Journal of Management, 41(1), 99–135. 10.1177/0149206314554214
(2012). A diary study on the happy worker: How job resources relate to positive emotions and personal resources. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(4), 489–517. 10.1080/1359432x.2011.584386
(2009). Bayesian mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 14(4), 301–322. 10.1037/a0016972
(1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285–305. 10.1016/s1048-9843(99)00013-2
(2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
(2015). A lifespan perspective on leadership. In P. M. BalD. T. A. M. KooijD. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Aging workers and the employee-employer relationship (pp. 87–104). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-08007-9_6
(2011). Age and leadership: The moderating role of legacy beliefs. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 43–50. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.006
(2011). Establishing the next generation at work: Leader generativity as a moderator of the relationships between leader age, leader-member exchange, and leadership success. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 241–252. 10.1037/a0021429
(Decision authority, job satisfaction, and mental health: A study of construction workers. Workar, 2(4), 428–435. 10.1093/workar/waw006