Skip to main content
Übersichtsarbeit

Kognitive Profile bei lese-rechtschreibschwachen Kindern mit und ohne Aufmerksamkeitsprobleme

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/2235-0977/a000188

Zusammenfassung. Lese-Rechtschreibschwierigkeiten gehen sehr häufig mit Auffälligkeiten in der Aufmerksamkeit einher. Etwa jedes fünfte Kind mit Lese-Rechtschreibschwäche erfüllt auch die Kriterien einer ADHS. Für die vorliegende Studie war hierbei von Interesse, ob Kinder mit isolierten Schriftsprachschwierigkeiten die gleichen kognitiven Funktionseinschränkungen aufweisen wie Kinder mit komorbider Aufmerksamkeitsproblematik. Insgesamt 99 Drittklässler mit durchschnittlicher Intelligenz (33 Kinder mit Lese-Rechtschreibschwäche, 33 Kinder mit Lese-Rechtschreibschwäche und Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit sowie 33 unauffällige Kinder der Kontrollgruppe) wurden hinsichtlich ihrer Leistungen in der phonologischen Informationsverarbeitung, Sprache und zentral-exekutiven Arbeitsgedächtnisfunktionen miteinander verglichen. Es zeigte sich, dass die lese-rechtschreibschwachen Kinder Auffälligkeiten in den Sprachfähigkeiten, im phonologischen Arbeitsgedächtnis und in der Benennungsgeschwindigkeit aufwiesen, die Kinder mit Lese-Rechtschreibschwäche und zusätzlicher Aufmerksamkeitsproblematik dagegen in den zentral-exekutiven Funktionen. Beide Gruppen schnitten dagegen gleichermaßen schwach im Vergleich zur Kontrollgruppe in der phonologischen Bewusstheit ab. Anhand des spezifischen kognitiven Funktionsprofils können 58–64 % der Kinder korrekt zu den einzelnen Gruppen klassifiziert werden. Insgesamt zeigen sich deutliche Unterschiede in den kognitiven Funktionsmustern, aber auch Gemeinsamkeiten, die in der Diagnostik und lerntherapeutischen Intervention Berücksichtigung finden sollten.


Cognitive profiles of dyslexic children with and without additional ADHD

Abstract.Background and Aims: Difficulties in reading and spelling (hereinafter referred to as dyslexia) often go hand in hand with additional problems of inattention. In fact, approximately one in five children with dyslexia also meets the diagnostic criteria of ADHD. In recent years, there is increasing interest in examining the underlying causes of dyslexia and investigating the cognitive circumstances that lead to comorbid inattention symptoms in some of these children. Although progress has been made in identifying the multi-causal nature of poor reading and spelling skills, the specificity of cognitive dysfunctions as they relate to different subgroups of dyslexic children remains to be determined. Thus, the aim of the present study was twofold: Firstly, it was of interest whether dyslexic children with versus without additional inattention problems show the same or different cognitive dysfunctions. Secondly, the study examined whether group membership can be reliably classified based on the children's cognitive profiles. Methods: Overall, 99 third-graders (33 children with Dyslexia-only, 33 children with Dyslexia + Inattention, and 33 control group (CG) children) participated in this study. The two dyslexia groups showed below-average skills in reading and/or spelling (T < 40), while the CG performed at least average in both literacy skills (T ≥ 45). All children were normally achieving in mathematics and showed at least average intelligence. Children in the Dyslexia + Inattention group exhibited additional symptoms of inattention as indicated by parent ratings. The sample completed a comprehensive test battery assessing phonological awareness, rapid automatized naming (RAN), working memory (WM), and language skills (i.e., morphology and vocabulary). Results: To address the first research question, univariate or multivariate analyses of variance (ANOVAs and MANOVAs, respectively) were conducted for each of the functional constructs. Results revealed that the cognitive profiles were different for children with Dyslexia versus Dyslexia + Inattention. Specifically, the Dyslexia-only group exhibited problems in morphology, in RAN and in the phonological loop of WM. In contrast, the Dyslexia + Inattention group showed specific impairments in the central executive. Cognitive similarities between Dyslexia-only and Dyslexia + Inattention were only found for (a) phonological awareness, in which both groups performed significantly lower than the CG, and for (b) the visual spatial sketchpad of WM, in which no deficits were observed across groups. Next, a discriminant function analysis was performed to address the second research question, namely whether group membership can be determined based on the cognitive profiles. In fact, a highly significant proportion of the sample (i.e., Dyslexia-only group: 58 %, Dyslexia + Inattention group: 64 %, and CG group: 61 %) could be classified correctly – this is more than twice the rate that would be expected based on a classification by chance (33 %). Discussion: There are clear differences but also a few similarities in the cognitive dysfunctions associated with Dyslexia-only versus Dyslexia + Inattention. In particular, children with Dyslexia-only showed typical impairments in phonological information processing with a core deficit in phonological awareness, RAN and the phonological loop. Conversely, for children with Dyslexia + Inattention, impairments in phonological processing were only evident for phonological awareness. Reduced control processes of the central executive seem to be a core characteristic associated with this double deficit group. Since phonological awareness tasks draw to some extent on central-executive processes as well as on phonological storage capacity, it is reasonable to assume that poor phonological awareness in children with Dyslexia-only can be attributed to their poor phonological loop, whereas in children with Dyslexia + Inattention it is mostly related to their poor central executive. Implications for the diagnostic process and the therapeutic interventions of affected children are discussed.

Literatur

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Birkel, P. (2007). Weingartener Grundwortschatz Rechtschreib-Test für 2. und 3. Klassen (WRT 2+). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brandenburg, J., Klesczewski, J., Fischbach, A., Schuchardt, K., Büttner, G. & Hasselhorn, M. (2015). Working memory in children with learning disabilities in reading versus spelling: Searching for overlapping and specific cognitive factors. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 622–634. doi: 10.1177/0022219414521665 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Castles, A. & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149–180. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90003-E First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cattell, R., Weiß, R. H. & Osterland, J. (1997). Culture Fair Test – Grundintelligenztest Skala 1 (CFT 1). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Catts, H., Adlof, S., Hogan, T. & Ellis Weismer, S. (2005). Are specific language impairment and dyslexia distinct disorders?Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1378–1396. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/096) First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Lambert, W. & Hamlett, C. (2012). The cognitive and academic profiles of reading and mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilites, 45, 79–95. doi: 10.1177/0022219410393012 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Jong, C. G. W., Oosterlaan, J. & Sergeant, J. A. (2006). The role of double dissociation studies in the search for candidate endophenotypes for the comorbidity of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and reading disability. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 53, 177–193. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinder und Jugendpsychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie e. V. – DGKJP (2015). Diagnostik und Behandlung von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Lese- und/oder Rechtschreibstörung: Evidenz- und konsensbasierte Leitlinie (AWMF-Leitlinie). Zugriff über http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/028-044.html. doi:10.1111/j.1469- 7610.2009.02164.x First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Döpfner, M., Breuer, D., Wille, N., Erhart, M. & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2008). How often do children meet ICD-10/DSM-IV criteria of attention deficit-/hyperactivity disorder and hyerkinetic disorder? Parent-based precalence rates in a national sample – results of the BELLA study. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 17, 59–70. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Döpfner, M., Görtz-Dorten, A. & Lehmkuhl, G. (2008). Diagnostik-System für psychische Störungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter nach ICD-10 und DSM-IV, DISYPS-II. Bern: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fischbach, A., Schuchardt, K., Brandenburg, J., Klesczewski, J., Balke-Melcher, C., Schmidt, C.et al. (2013). Prävalenz von Lernschwächen und Lernstörungen: Zur Bedeutung der Diagnosekriterien. Lernen und Lernstörungen, 2, 65–76. doi: 10.1024/2235-0977/a000035 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Fischbach, A., Schuchardt, K., Mähler, C. & Hasselhorn, M. (2010). Zeigen Kinder mit schulischen Minderleistungen sozio-emotionale Auffälligkeiten?Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 42, 201–210. doi:10.1026/0049-8637/a000025 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Furnes, B. & Samuelsson, S. (2011). Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming predicting early development in reading and spelling: Results from a cross-linguistic longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.10.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greven, C. U., Rijsdijk, F. V., Asherson, P. & Plomin, R. (2012). A longitudinal twin study on the association between ADHD symptoms and reading. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 234–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02445.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Griffiths, Y. M. & Snowling, M. J. (2002). Predictors of exception word and nonword reading in dyslexic children: The severity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 34–43. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.34 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hasselhorn, M., Schumann-Hengsteler, R., Gronauer, J., Grube, D., Mähler, C., Schmid, I.et al. (2012). Arbeitsgedächtnistestbatterie für Kinder von 5 bis 12 Jahren (AGTB 5–12). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Katz, L. J., Brown, F. C., Roth, R. M. & Beers, S. R. (2011). Processing speed and working memory performance in those with both ADHD and a reading disorder compared with those with ADHD alone. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 26, 425–433. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr026 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kohn, J., Wyschkon, A., Ballaschk, K., Ihle, G. & Esser, G. (2013). Verlauf von Umschriebenen Entwicklungsstörungen: Eine 30-Monats-follow-up-Studie. Lernen und Lernstörungen, 2, 77–89. doi: 10.1024/2235-0977/a000032 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Krajewski, K., Liehm, S. & Schneider, W. (2004). Deutscher Mathematiktest für zweite Klassen (DEMAT 2+). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Landerl, K. & Moll, K. (2010). Comorbidity of learning disorders: Prevalence and familial transmission. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51, 287–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1469- 7610.2009.02164.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Landerl, K. & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150–161. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.150 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lenhard, W. & Schneider, W. (2006). Ein Leseverständnistest für Erst- bis Sechstklässler (ELFE 1–6). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Maehler, C. & Schuchardt, K. (2016). Working memory in children with specific learning disorders and/or attention deficits. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 341–347. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manis, F., Seidenberg, M., Doi, L., McBride-Chang, C. & Petersen, A. (1996). On the bases of two subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 58, 157–195. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Massetti, G. M., Lahey, B. B., Pelham, W. E., Loney, J., Ehrhardt, A., Lee, S. S. & Kipp, H. (2008). Academic achievement over 8 years among children who met modified criteria for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder at 4–6 years of age. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 399–410. doi: 10.1007/s-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McArthur, G. M., Hogben, J. H., Edward, V. T., Heath, S. M. & Mengler, E. D. (2000). On the „specifics“ of specific reading disability and specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychological Psychiatry, 41, 869–874. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00674 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McGrath, L. M., Pennington, B. F., Shanahan, M. A., Santerre-Lemmon, L. E., Bernard, H. D., Willcutt, E. G.et al. (2011). A multiple model of reading disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: searching for shared cognitive deficits. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 547–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02346.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moll, K., Wallner, R. & Landerl, K. (2012). Kognitive Korrelate der Lese-, Leserechtschreib- und der Rechtschreibstörung. Lernen und Lernstörungen, 1, 7–19. doi: 10.1024/2235-0977/a000002 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Morgan, W. P. (1896). A case of congenital word blindness. British Medical Journal, 2, 1378. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nikolopoulos, D., Goulandris, N., Hulme, C. & Snowling, M. J. (2006). The cognitive bases of learning to read and spell in Greek: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp. 2005.11.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pennington, B. F., Groisser, D., & Welsh, M. C. (1993). Contrasting cognitive deficits in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder versus reading disability. Developmental Psychology, 29, 511–523. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Petermann, F. (2010). Sprachstandserhebungstest für Kinder im Alter zwischen 5 und 10 Jahren (SET 5–10). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Peterson, R. L., Pennington, B. F.Olson, R. K. & Wadsworth, S. J. (2014). Longitudinal stability of phonological and surface subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 347–362. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2014.904870 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Polychroni, F., Koukoura, K. & Anagnostou, I. (2006). Academic self-concept, reading attitudes and approaches to learning of children with dyslexia: do they differ from their peers?European Journal of Special Needs Education, 21, 415–430. doi: 10.1080/08856250600956311 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ramus, F. & Szenkovits, G. (2008). What phonological deficit? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 129–141. doi: 10.1080/17470210701508822 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schuchardt, K. & Mähler, C. (2016). Exekutive Funktionen bei Kindern mit Lernstörungen. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 65, 389–405. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schuchardt, K., Brandenburg, J., Fischbach, A., Büttner, G., Grube, D., Mähler, C.et al. (2015). Die Entwicklung des akademischen Selbstkonzeptes bei Grundschulkindern mit Lernschwierigkeiten. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 18, 513–526. doi: 10.1007/s-z. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schuchardt, K., Fischbach, A., Balke-Melcher, C. & Mähler, C. (2015). Die Komorbidität von Lernschwierigkeiten mit ADHS-Symptomen im Grundschulalter. Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 43, 185–193. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000352 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schuchardt, K., Grube, D. & Mähler, C. (2013). „Schwierige Kinder“ von Anfang an? – Aufmerksamkeitsprobleme als Risikofaktor für die Schulfähigkeit. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 22, 217–223. doi: 10.1026/0942-5403/a000120 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schuchardt, K., Mähler, C. & Hasselhorn, M. (2008). Working memory deficits in children with specific learning disorders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 514–523. doi: 10.1177/0022219408317856 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shanahan, M. A., Pennington, B. F., Yerys, B. E., Scott, A., Boada, R., Willcutt, E. G.et al. (2006). Processing speed deficits in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and reading disability. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 585–602. doi: 10.1007/s-8. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sowerby, P., Seal, S. & Tripp, G. (2011). Working memory deficits in ADHD: The contribution of age, learning/language difficulties, and task parameters. Journal of Attention Disorders, 15, 461–472. doi: 10.1177/1087054710370674. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stanovich, K. E., Siegel, L. S. & Gottardo, A. (1997). Converging evidence for phonological and surface subtypes of reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 114–127. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.114 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stock, C., Marx, P. & Schneider, W. (2003). Basiskompetenzen für Lese-Rechtschreibleistungen. Ein Test zur Erfassung der phonologischen Bewusstheit vom ersten bis vierten Schuljahr; BAKO 1–4. Göttingen: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Swanson, H. L. & Alexander, J. E. (1997). Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 128–158. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swanson, H. L., Zheng, X. & Jerman, O. (2009). Working memory, short-term memory, and reading disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 260–287. doi: 10.1177/0022219409331958 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tiffin-Richards, M. C., Hasselhorn, M., Woerner, W., Rothenberger, A. & Banaschewski, T. (2008). Phonological short-term memory and central executive processing in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with/without dyslexia – evidence of cognitive overlap. Journal of Neural Transmission, 115, 227–234. doi: 10.1007/s-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J. & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40. doi: 10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wadsworth, S. J., DeFries, J. C:, Willcutt, E. G., Pennington, B. F. & Olson, R. K., (2015). The colorado longitudinal twin study of reading difficulties and ADHD: etiologies of comorbidity and stability. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 18, 755–761. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wagner, R. K. & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.101.2.192 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Westerberg, H., Hirvikoski, T., Forssberg, H., & Kingberg, T. (2004). Visual-spatial working memory span: A sensitive measure of cognitive deficits in children with ADHD. Child Neuropsychology, 10, 155–161. doi: 10.1080/09297040490911014 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Willcutt, E. G., Betjemann, R. S., McGrath, L. M., Chhabildas, N. A., Olson, R. K., DeFries, J. C.et al. (2010). Etiology and neuropsychology of comorbidity between RD and ADHD: The case for multiple-deficit models. Cortex, 46, 1345–1361. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.06.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Willcutt, E. G., Pennington, B. F., Olson, R. K., Chhabildas, N. & Hulslander, J. (2005). Neuropsychological analyses of comorbidity between reading disability and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: In search of the common deficit. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27, 35–78. doi: 10.1207/s15326942dn2701_3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wolff, U. (2010). Subgrouping of readers based on performance measures: a latent profile analysis. Reading and Writing, 23, 209–208. doi: 10.1007/s-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar