Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Instrumente der Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie

Fragebogen zur integrativen Führung

Published Online:March 28, 2019https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000294

Abstract

Zusammenfassung. Der vorliegende Artikel rezensiert den Fragebogen zur integrativen Führung. Der Fragebogen zur integrativen Führung ist ein Fragebogen zur Messung transformationaler, transaktionaler, instrumenteller und negativer Führung sowie zur Kommunikation der Führungskraft. Er liegt im Selbstberichtsformat für Führungskräfte und im Fremdberichtsformat für Mitarbeitende von Führungskräften vor.


Questionnaire for Integrative Leadership

Abstract. The present article reviews the German “Fragebogen zur integrativen Führung” (Questionnaire for Integrative Leadership). This questionnaire assesses transformational, transactional, instrumental and abusive leadership as well as leaders’ communication. It is available in a self-report format for leaders and in an other-report format for followers.

Literatur

  • Antonakis, J. & House, R. J. (2014). Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational–transactional leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 746 – 771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M. & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re‐examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441 – 462. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317999166789 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Borgmann, L., Rowold, J. & Bormann, K. (2016). Integrating leadership research: A meta-analytical test of Yukl’s meta-categories of leadership. Personnel Review, 45, 1340 – 1366. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2014-0145 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Burke, M. J. & Dunlap, W. P. (2002). Estimating interrater agreement with the average deviation index: A user’s guide. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 159 – 172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428102005002002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cohrs, C. (2017). A communication based approach to leadership: Two empirical studies deepening the understanding of the relationship between leaders’ communicator styles, transformational leadership behavior and leadership development. Dissertation, Technische Universität Dortmund. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohrs, C., Diebig, M., Rowold, J. & Bormann, K. C. (2016). Gütekriterien einer deutschen Kurzform des Communicator Style Measure (CSM-D). Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 60, 130 – 144. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000215 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98 – 104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N. & Humphrey, S. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64, 7 – 52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Felfe, J. (2006). Validierung einer deutschen Version des “Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire“ (MLQ Form 5 x Short) von Bass und Avolio (1995). Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 50, 61 – 78. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089.50.2.61 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Heinitz, K. & Rowold, J. (2007). Gütekriterien einer deutschen Adaptation des transformational leadership inventory (TLI) von Podsakoff. Zeitschrift für Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie, 51, 1 – 15. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089.51.1.1 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Judge, T. A. & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755 – 768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kersting, M. (2008). Zur Akzeptanz von Intelligenz- und Leistungstests. Report Psychologie, 33, 420 – 433. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Norton, R. (1983). Communicator style: Theory, applications, and measures. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H. & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107 – 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rowold, J. (2011). Relationship between leadership behaviors and performance: The moderating role of a work team’s level of age, gender, and cultural heterogeneity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32, 628 – 647. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731111161094 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rowold, J. (2014). Instrumental leadership: Extending the transformational-transactional leadership paradigm. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 28, 367 – 390. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rowold, J. & Poethke, U. (2017). Fragebogen zur integrativen Führung (FIF). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23 – 74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schyns, B. & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 138 – 158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith-Crowe, K. & Burke, M. J. (2003). Interpreting the statistical significance of observed AD interrater agreement values: Correction to Burke and Dunlap (2002). Organizational Research Methods, 6, 129 – 131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428102239428 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178 – 190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tepper, B. J., Moss, S. E., Lockhart, D. E. & Carr, J. C. (2007). Abusive supervision, upward maintenance communication, and subordinates’ psychological distress. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1169 – 1180. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159918 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wang, G., Oh, I.-S., Courtright, S. H. & Colbert, A. E. (2011). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & Organization Management, 36, 223 – 270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111401017 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yukl, G. (2012). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26, 66 – 85. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0088 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar