Skip to main content
Originalia

Eine Skala zur Erfassung der Ekelsensitivität (SEE)

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000016

Zusammenfassung.Theoretischer Hintergrund: Die Persönlichkeitseigenschaft Ekelsensitivität beschreibt die Neigung einer Person, Ekelerlebnisse als negativ und unkontrollierbar zu bewerten. Fragestellung: Entwicklung einer deutschsprachigen Skala zur Erfassung der Ekelsensitivität (SEE). Methode: Zur Entwicklung (exploratorische, konfirmatorische Faktorenanalyse) und Validierung der SEE diente eine Gesamtstichprobe von 1072 Personen. Ergebnisse: Die neu entwickelte Skala mit guter interner Konsistenz (Cronbachs α = 0.85) besteht aus sieben Items. Die SEE korreliert moderat positiv mit der Neigung Ekel zu erleben (Ekelempfindlichkeit, r = .35), mit spritzenphobischen (r = .20) sowie sozialphobischen Tendenzen (r = .28). Der Zusammenhang zwischen Ekelsensitivität und Phobieneigungen ist unabhängig vom Ausmaß der Ekelempfindlichkeit. Schlussfolgerung: Die SEE ist eine reliable, ökonomische Skala zur Erfassung der Ekelsensitivität, deren spezifischer Zusammenhang mit bestimmten Phobietypen (Spritzen-, Sozialphobie) weiter überprüft werden sollte.


A scale for assessing disgust sensitivity (SADS)

Abstract.Background: The personality trait disgust sensitivity refers to the tendency of a person to perceive disgust experiences as aversive and uncontrollable. Objective: Development of a German scale for the assessment of disgust sensitivity (SADS). Methods: The SADS was developed (exploratory, confirmatory factor analysis) and validated with a total of 1,072 subjects. Results: The new scale consists of seven items with good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.85). The SADS shows moderate correlations with the tendency to experience disgust (disgust propensity, r = .35), fear of injections (r = .20), and sociophobic tendencies (r = .28). The relationship between disgust sensitivity and phobic tendencies is independent of disgust propensity. Conclusion: The SADS is a brief, reliable scale for the assessment of disgust sensitivity. Its specific association with certain phobia subtypes (injections, social phobia) needs further study.

Literatur

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borkenau, P. , Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, M. W. , Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cavanagh, K. , Davey, G. C. L. (2000). The development of a measure of individual differences in disgust. Paper presented to the British Psychological Society, Winchester, UK. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cisler, J. M. , Olatunji, B. O. , Lohr, J. M. (2009a). Disgust, fear, and the anxiety disorders: A critical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 34–46. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cisler, J. M. , Olatunji, B. O. , Lohr, J. M. (2009b). Disgust sensitivity and emotion regulation potentiate the effect of disgust propensity on spider fear, blood-injection-injury fear, and contamination fear. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 40, 219–229. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davey, G. C. L. , Bond, N. (2006). Using controlled comparisons in disgust psychopathology research: The case of disgust, hypochondriasis and health anxiety. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 37, 4–15. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish, M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (pp. 45–60). Sussex, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haidt, J. , McCauley, C. R. , Rozin, P. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701–713. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hodgson, R. J. , Rachman, S. J. (1977). Obsessional-compulsive complaints. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 15, 389–395. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. , Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model miss-pecifications. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klorman, R. , Weerts, T. , Hastings, J. , Melamed, B. , Lang, P. (1974). Psychometric description of some fear-specific questionnaires. Behaviour Research, 5, 401–409. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krey, H. (2004). Gefühlsregulierung in der Pflegeausbildung – Eine Untersuchung zum Ekelempfinden von Auszubildenden in der Pflege im 3. Ausbildungsjahr. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 5, 1–8. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Olatunji, B. O. , Lohr, J. M. , Sawchuk, C. N. , Tolin, D. F. (2007a). Multimodal assessment of disgust in contamination-related obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 263–276. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Olatunji, B. O. , Cisler, J. M. , Deacon, B. J. , Connolly, K. , Lohr, J. M. (2007b). The disgust propensity and sensitivity scale-revised: Psychometric properties and specificity in relation to anxiety disorder symptoms. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 918–930. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Olatunji, B. O. (2009). Incremental specificity of disgust propensity and sensitivity in the prediction of health anxiety symptoms. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 40, 230–239. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Page, A. C. , Bennett, K. S. , Carter, O. , Smith, J. , Woodmore, K. (1997). The Blood-Injection Symptom Scale (BISS): Assessing a structure of phobic symptoms elicited by blood and injections. Behavior Research and Therapy, 35 (5), 457–464. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Power, M. J. , Dalgleish, T. (2008). Cognition and emotion. From order to disorder (2nd ed.). Hove: Psychological Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reiss, S. , Peterson, R. A. , Gursky, D. M. , McNally, R. J. (1986). Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency, and the prediction of fearfulness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 1–8. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rost, J. (1996). Lehrbuch Testtheorie Testkonstruktion. Bern: Hans Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rozin, P. , Fallon, A. E. (1987). A perspective on disgust. Psychological Review, 94, 23–41. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rozin, P. , Haidt, J. , McCauley, C. R. (2000). Disgust. In M. Lewis, J. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions (2nd ed., pp. 575–594). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sawchuk, C. N. , Lohr, J. M. , Tolin, D. F. , Lee, T. C. , Kleinknecht, R. A. (2000). Disgust sensitivity and contamination fears in spider and blood-injection-injury phobias. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 753–762. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sawchuk, C. N. , Lohr, J. M. , Westendorf, D. H. , Meunier, S. A. , Tolin, D. F. (2002). Emotional responding to fearful and disgusting stimuli in specific phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 1031–1046. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schienle, A. , Walter, B. , Vaitl, D. (2002). Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung der Ekelempfindlichkeit (FEE). Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 31, 110–120. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schienle, A. , Stark, R. , Walter, B. , Vaitl, D. (2003a). The connection between disgust sensitivity and blood related fears, faintness symptoms and obsessive-compulsiveness in a non-clinical sample. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 16, 185–193. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schienle, A. , Walter, B. , Schäfer, A. , Stark, R. , Vaitl, D. (2003b). Disgust sensitivity in psychiatric disorders: A questionnaire study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 191, 831–834. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schienle, A. , Walter, B. , Schäfer, A. , Stark, R. , Vaitl, D. (2005). Brain activation of spider phobics towards disorder-relevant, generally disgust- and fear-inducing pictures. Neuro-science Letters, 388, 1–6. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schneewind, K. A. , Graf, J. (1998). Der 16-Persönlichkeits-Faktoren-Test Revidierte Fassung (16 PF-R). Bern: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, D. , Witthöft, M. , Bailer, J. (2007). Kritische Überprüfung der Faktorenstruktur und Konstruktvalidität des Whiteley-Index – einem etablierten Screening – Instrument zur Erfassung von Hypochondrie. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 26, 128–136. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Sosic, Z. , Stangier, U. , Gieler, U. (2008). Evaluation of the Social Phobia Inventory in the German Population. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22, 849–859. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tabachnick, B. G. , Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York: Harper and Row. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tomkins, S. S. (1963). Affect, imagery and consciousness. Vol. 2. The negative affects. New York: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tomkins, S. S. (1987). Shame. In D. L. Nathanson (Ed.), The many faces of shame (pp. 133–161). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Overveld, W. J. M. , de Jong, P. J. , Peters, M. L. , Cavanagh, K. , Davey, G. C. L. (2006). Disgust propensity and disgust sensitivity: Separate constructs that are differentially related to specific fears. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1241–1252. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zwick, W. R. , Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432–442. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar