Abstract
Zusammenfassung.Hintergrund: Es wird die Literatur zu folgenden Fragen gesichtet: 1) Nutzen Menschen mit sozialer Angst das Internet und Onlinekommunikation stärker als andere? 2) Ist der Gebrauch des Internets bei sozial Ängstlichen hilfreich, weil er soziale Kontakte fördert oder stellt er eine aufrechterhalten Bedingung dar, weil Realkontakte subjektiv weniger wichtig werden? 3) Erleichtert oder erschwert die Option Onlinekommunikation die Psychotherapie der sozialen Angststörung? Methoden: Die bis Juli 2015 in Web of Science, PubMed oder PsycINFO gelisteten Arbeiten zur Thematik wurden gesichtet. Ergebnisse: Die 43 identifizierten Studien belegen, dass Menschen mit sozialer Angst das Internet nicht stärker nutzen, auch nicht zur Anbahnung zwischenmenschlicher Beziehungen. Sie haben eher weniger Online-Beziehungen, nutzen aber gleichzeitig überproportional Online- gegenüber Face-to-face-Kommunikation, insbesondere zur Selbstregulation. Schlussfolgerungen: Vor- und Nachteile der Onlinekommunikation für den Verlauf der sozialen Angst lassen sich empirisch belegen, wobei klinische Studien noch völlig fehlen. Onlinekommunikation gehört zur Alltagsrealität von Patienten mit sozialer Angst und ist in der Psychoedukation zur Störung sowie in der Fallkonzeption zu berücksichtigen.
Abstract.Background and Aims: The present literature review addresses the following questions: (a) Do individuals with social anxiety use the Internet and, in particular, online communication more intensively than individuals without social anxiety? (b) Is online communication beneficial in decreasing social anxiety by supporting social contacts or is it a maintaining factor for social anxiety by decreasing the subjective importance of offline contacts? (c) Does the option of online communication aid or impede psychotherapy of social anxiety disorder? Method: We reviewed the relevant peer-reviewed publications listed in Web of Science, PubMed, or PsycINFO until July 2015. Results: The 43 studies included in this review do not support an association between social anxiety and online communication. Moreover, prior studies show that individuals with social anxiety do not initiate more social contacts online than do individuals without social anxiety. By contrast, studies consistently show that socially anxious individuals disproportionally prefer online versus offline communication and use online communication for self-regulation. Conclusion: The present review emphasizes the benefits and disadvantages of Internet use and particularly online communication for individuals with social anxiety. Social Internet use is integral in everyday life and its dynamics should be an essential part of the therapeutic considerations for and psychoeducation of patients with social anxiety.
Die mit * gekennzeichneten Arbeiten wurde in das systematische Review eingeschlossen.
Literatur
*2013). The association between Internet user characteristics and dimensions of Internet addiction among Greek adolescents. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 11, 139 – 148. doi: 10.1007/s11469-012-9404-3
(2007). Computer-mediated communication and interpersonal attraction: An experimental test of two explanatory hypotheses. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 831 – 835. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9945
(2015). Social comparison, envy, and depression on Facebook: A study looking at the effects of high comparison standards on depressed individuals. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34, 277 – 289.
(2010). Shyness and online social networking services. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 873 – 889. doi: 10.1177/0265407510375261
(2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self“ on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 33 – 48.
(*2014). Prevalence and predictors of text-based and visually explicit cybersex among adolescents. Young, 22, 43 – 65. doi: 10.1177/0973258613512923
(2002). College students’ Internet use, relationship formation, and personality correlates. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5, 551 – 557.
(*2010). The relationship of loneliness and social anxiety with children’s and adolescents’ online communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13, 279 – 285. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0215
(*2006). Internet use by the socially fearful: Addiction or therapy? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9, 69 – 81.
(2005). A social skill account of problematic Internet use. Journal of Communication, 55, 721 – 736.
(*2007). Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 234 – 242. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9963
(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155 – 159.
(*2012). Social network profiles as information sources for adolescents’ offline relations. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15, 290 – 295. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0557
(*2010). A longitudinal study of the relation between adolescent boys and girls’ computer use with friends and friendship quality: Support for the social compensation or the rich-get-richer hypothesis? Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 896 – 905. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.004
(*2013). Associations of social anxiety and depression with cognitions related to problematic Internet use in youths. Education and Science, 38, 19 – 29.
(*2004). The Internet: home to a severe population of individuals with social anxiety disorder? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 18, 629 – 646. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2003.08.002
(*2013). The relationship between social anxiety and online communication among adolescents in the city of isfahan, iran. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 4, 390 – 395.
(2007). Is post-event processing specific for social phobia? Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38, 11 – 22.
(*2012). Profiling: Predicting social anxiety from Facebook profiles. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 706 – 713. doi: 10.1177/1948550611434967
(*2007). Internet use and well-being among college students: Beyond frequency of use. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 674 – 688.
(*2005). Liar, liar: Internet faking but not frequency of use affects social skills, self-esteem, social anxiety, and aggression. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8, 1 – 6.
(2008). Do shy people prefer to send E-mail? Social Psychology, 39, 231 – 243. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335.39.4.231
(*2009). Social anxiety and computer-mediated communication during initial interactions: Implications for the hyperpersonal perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 475 – 482. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.10.011
(2015). Exploring the effective help for social anxiety: MMORPGs delivering online help. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 7, 10 – 18. doi: 10.5539/ijms.v7n2p10
(2008). Social-psychological influences on opinion expression in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 35, 190 – 207. doi: 10.1177/0093650207313159
(2013). Depersonalisation/derealisation during acute social stress in social phobia. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 27, 178 – 187. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.01.002
(2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177 – 192.
(*2014). Problematizing excessive online gaming and its psychological predictors. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 118 – 122. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.017
(*2014). Cyber-bullying: An investigation of the psychological profile of university student participants. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 204 – 214. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2014.04.001
(*2015). Online gaming in the context of social anxiety. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 29, 473 – 482. doi: 10.1037/adb0000070
(*2012). Seeking safety on the internet: relationship between social anxiety and problematic internet use. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26, 197 – 205.
(*2005). Physical interpersonal relationships and social anxiety among online game players. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8, 15 – 20.
(*2006). Internet communication: An activity that appeals to shy and socially phobic people? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9, 618 – 622.
(*2012). Haven’t we met somewhere before? The effects of a brief Internet introduction on social anxiety in a subsequent face to face interaction. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50, 359 – 365.
(*2004). Internet use, identity development and social anxiety among young adults. Behaviour Change, 21, 90 – 102. doi: 10.1375/bech.21.2.90.55425
(1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity “Demarginalization“ Through Virtual Group Participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 681 – 694.
(*2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9 – 31.
(1993). Anxiety and self-disclosure: Toward a motivational model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1000 – 1009.
(2003). Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 659 – 671. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00040-2
(*2006). Research note: Individual differences in perceptions of Internet communication. European Journal of Communication, 21, 213 – 226.
(*2006) Precursors of adolescents’ use of visual and audio devices during online communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2473 – 2487. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.04.002
(2009). Social phobia and perceived friendship quality. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 872 – 878. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.05.001
(*2012). Video game addiction test: validity and psychometric characteristics. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15, 507 – 511.
(1994).
(Parametric measures of effect size . In H. CooperL. V. HedgesEds., The Handbook of Research Synthesis (pp. 231 – 244). New York, NY: Sage.*2007). Precursors and underlying processes of adolescents’ online self-disclosure: Developing and testing an “Internet-Attribute-Perception“ model. Media Psychology, 10, 292 – 315. doi: 10.1080/15213260701375686
(2015). Social anxiety and loneliness in adults who solicit minors online. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1079063215612440
(*2009). Different types of Internet use, depression, and social anxiety: the role of perceived friendship quality. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 819 – 833. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.10.011
(*2015). Social anxiety and physiological arousal during computer mediated vs. face to face communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 202 – 208. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.056
(*2015). Correlates of Facebook usage patterns: The relationship between passive Facebook use, social anxiety symptoms, and brooding. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 575 – 580.
(*2005). Reasons for internet use and social anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 949 – 958. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.001
(*2007). College dating and social anxiety: using the Internet as a means of connecting to others. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 680 – 688.
(2016). Soziale Angststörung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 321 – 326.
(*2011). Qualities of peer relations on social networking websites: Predictions from negative mother-teen interactions. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 595 – 607. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00692.x
(2005). Social interpretation bias and generalized social phobia: the influence of developmental experiences. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 759 – 777. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.06.006
(*2011). Social anxiety, motivation, self-disclosure, and computer-mediated friendship: A path analysis of the social interaction in the blogosphere. Communication Research, 40, 237 – 260. doi: 10.1177/0093650211420137
(2008). Shyness 2: treating social phobia online: replication and extension. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 42, 595 – 605. doi: 10.1080/00048670802119820
(*2008). Adolescents’ Identity Experiments on the Internet: Consequences for Social Competence and Self-Concept Unity. Communication Research, 35, 208 – 231. doi: 10.1177/0093650207313164
(*2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43, 267 – 277.
(*2011). The mediator role of self-disclosure and moderator roles of gender and social anxiety in the relationship between Chinese adolescents’ online communication and their real-world social relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2161 – 2168. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.010
(*2012). The association between online gaming, social phobia, and depression: an internet survey. BMC psychiatry, 12, 92 – 98. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-92
(*2012). Compensatory internet use among individuals higher in social anxiety and its implications for well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 191 – 195. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.003
(*2015). I’m still socially anxious online: Offline relationship impairment characterizing social anxiety manifests and is accurately perceived in online social networking profiles. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 12 – 19.
(2000). Disability and quality of life in pure and comorbid social phobia. Findings from a controlled study. European Psychiatry, 15, 46 – 58.
(*2012). Social anxiety in online and real-life interaction and their associated factors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15, 7 – 12. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0015
(*2012). Cognitive appraisal mediating relationship between social anxiety and internet communication in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 78 – 83. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.09.001
(