Side Effects of Business Coaching and Their Predictors From the Coachees’ Perspective
Abstract
Abstract. Sound research demonstrates the substantial positive effects of business coaching, but little is known about potential side effects. This study sheds light on the characteristics of side effects of coaching from the coachees’ perspective and investigates three possible predictors: relationship quality between coach and coachee, the coach’s expertise, and the coachees’ motivation to change. Data was collected in a time-lagged design from 111 coachees who received business coaching in Germany. Coachees reported that side effects were frequent but with low to moderate intensity. The number of side effects was negatively associated with relationship quality at both measurement times and with coach’s expertise at Time 1. Results expand knowledge about side effects of coaching and reveal opportunities for how they can be reduced.
References
2007). The characteristics of dyadic trust in executive coaching. Journal of Leadership Studies, 1, 18–27. doi: 10.1002/jls.20004
(2010). Negative effects from psychological treatments: A perspective. The American Psychologist, 65, 13–20. doi: 10.1037/a0015643
(2009). The coach-coachee relationship in executive coaching: A field study. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20, 85–106. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.20009
(2002). Dangers of executive coaching. Harvard Business Review, 80, 86–92.
(2009). The elephant on the couch: Side-effects of psychotherapy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 787–795. doi: 10.1080/00048670903107559
(2002). Resistance in psychotherapy: What conclusions are supported by research. Psychotherapy in Practice, 58, 207–217. doi: 10.1002/jclp.1144
(2005). Critical factors in executive coaching – the coaching relationship. Industrial and Commercial Training, 37, 336–340. doi: 10.1108/00197850510626785
(1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16, 252–260. doi: 10.1037/h0085885
(2010). Building successful leadership coaching relationships: Examining impact of matching criteria in a leadership coaching program. Journal of Management Development, 29, 914–931. doi: 10.1108/02621711011084231
(2014). Academic background and credibility in executive coaching effectiveness. Personnel Review, 43, 881–897. doi: 10.1108/PR-10-2013-0171
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
(2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 678–707. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678
(1984). The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and implications. The Elementary School Journal, 85, 5–20. doi: 10.1086/461388
(2004). Engaging in self-reflection changes self-concept clarity: On differences between women and men, and low- and high-clarity individuals. Sex Roles, 50, 469–480. doi: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000023067.77649.29
(2012). Signalling a new trend in executive coaching outcome research. International Coaching Psychology Review, 8, 6–19.
(2013). Executive coaching outcome research: The contribution of common factors such as relationship, personality match, and self-efficacy. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 65, 40–57. doi: 10.1037/a0031635
(1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
(1995).
(For better, for worse, for richer, for poorer: The rough and the smooth of relationships . In S. DuckJ. T. WoodEds., Confronting relationship challenges (pp. 1–21). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.2002). Further investigation of protégés’ negative mentoring experiences: Patterns and outcomes. Group and Organization Management, 27, 456–479. doi: 10.1177/1059601102238357
(2004). The protégé’s role in negative mentoring experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 255–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2003.07.001
(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
(2002). Disclosure to therapists: What is and is not discussed in psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 359–370. doi: 10.1002/jclp.1148
(2005). Executive coaching: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 31, 829–848. doi: 10.1177/0149206305279599
(2006). Does coaching work or are we asking the wrong question? International Coaching Psychology Review, 1, 23–36.
(2003). An examination of the role of age in mentoring relationships. Group and Organization Management, 28, 249–281. doi: 10.1177/1059601103028002004
(2002). The self-reflection and insight scale: A new measure of private self-consciousness. Social Behavior and Personality, 30, 821–836. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2002.30.8.821
(2007). Advances in research on coaching outcomes. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2, 222–249.
(2013). Resistance, motivational interviewing, and executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 65, 108–127. doi: 10.1037/a0033196
(2002).
(Using executive coaching in organizations: What can go wrong (and how to prevent it) . In C. FitzgeraldJ. G. BergerEds., Executive Coaching: Practices and Perspectives (pp. 203–223). Palo Alto, CA: Davis-Black.2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48, 9–16. doi: 10.1037/a0022186
(2013). Why interpersonal dominance and affiliation matter: An interaction analysis of the coach-client relationship. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 6, 25–46. doi: 10.1080/17521882.2012.740489
(2004). Erfolgreiches Coaching: Wirkungsforschung im Coaching
([Successful coaching: Effect research in coaching] . Kröning, Germany: Asanger.1996). Toward a conceptual understanding and definition of executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 48, 134–144. doi: 10.1037/1061-4087.48.2.134
(2002).
(Failure and negative outcomes: The taboo topic in executive coaching . In C. FitzgeraldJ. G. BergerEds., Executive Coaching: Practices and Perspectives (pp. 283–301). Palo Alto, CA: Davis-Black.2010). Exploring clients’ readiness for coaching. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 4, 1–20.
(2007). Psychological treatments that cause harm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 53–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00029.x
(2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114–121.
(2007). Evaluating the effectiveness of executive coaching: Where are we now and where do we need to be? Australian Psychologist, 42, 310–318. doi: 10.1080/00050060701648217
(2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 438–450. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.68.3.438
(1981). Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades. Central States Speech Journal, 32, 24–34. doi: 10.1080/10510978109368075
(2009). Hidden in plain sight: The active ingredients of executive coaching. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2, 244–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01143.x
(1990).
(How critical reflection triggers transformative learning . In J. Mezirow and AssociatesEd., Fostering Critical reflection in Adulthood (pp. 1–20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.2005). The influence of ethnocentrism in organizational contexts: Perceptions of interviewee and managerial attractiveness, credibility, and effectiveness. Communication Quarterly, 53, 41–56. doi: 10.1080/01463370500055954
(2001). Effect of patient gender on outcome in two forms of short-term individual psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 10, 69–78.
(2007). An integrative model for executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 59, 68–78. doi: 10.1037/1065-9293.59.1.68
(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
(2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
. (1999). Mentor functions and outcomes: A comparison of men and women in formal and informal mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 529–550. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.529
(2002). Negative supervisory events: Effects on supervision and supervisory alliance. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 197–202. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.33.2.197
(2009). A tale of three perspectives examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 762–800. doi: 10.1177/1094428109332834
(1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 95–103. doi: 10.1037/h0045357
(2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02
(2001). An investigation of the moderating effects of gender on the relationships between mentorship initiation and protégé perceptions of mentoring functions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 342–363. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1809
(2014). Negative effects of coaching for coaches: An explorative study. International Coaching Psychology Review, 9, 167–182.
(2014). Zu Risiken und Nebenwirkungen lesen Sie … – Negative Effekte von Coaching
([For risks and side effects read … – Negative effects of coaching] . Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 58, 17–33. doi: 10.1026/0932-4089/a0001292011, August). A longitudinal investigation of the impact of positive and negative coaching on team effectiveness. Abstract published in the Proceedings of the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, USA. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/964710/A_Longitudinal_Investigation_of_the_Impact_of_Positive_and_Negative_Coaching_on_Team_Effectiveness
(2013).
(Gender issues in business coaching . In J. PassmoreD. PetersonT. FreireEds., The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of the psychology of coaching and mentoring (pp. 155–174). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.2004). The relative effectiveness of external, peer, and self-coaches. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 260–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00171.x
(2006). Communication correlates of perceived machiavellianism of supervisors: Communication orientations and outcomes. Communication Quarterly, 54, 127–142. doi: 10.1080/01463370600650829
(2014). Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2013.837499
(2002). Modern applied statistics with S (4th ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
(2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research, 13, 477–514. doi: 10.1177/1094428110366036
(2008). Factors in the selection and matching of executive coaches in organizations. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 1, 39–53. doi: 10.1080/17521880701878075
(