Abstract
Die vorliegende Studie untersuchte die im Job-Demand-Control-Support-Modell und Effort-Reward-Imbalance-Modell beschriebenen Tätigkeitsmerkmale in Bezug auf Depressivität in einer Stichprobe von 265 Erwerbstätigen. Anhand konfirmatorischer Faktorenanalysen wurden Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede beider Modelle geprüft. Anschließend wurde die Bedeutung der nachweisbaren Tätigkeitsmerkmale für die Vorhersage von Depressivität getestet und untersucht, inwieweit die Effekte durch Überforderungserleben mediiert werden. Die Analysen zeigten, dass die Modelle sowohl gemeinsame (Arbeitsintensität bzw. berufliche Anforderungen) als auch distinkte Arbeitsmerkmale (Tätigkeitsspielraum, Arbeitsplatzsicherheit, beruflicher Status, soziale Anerkennung) erfassen. Hohe Arbeitsintensität, geringe Arbeitsplatzsicherheit und fehlende soziale Anerkennung standen in signifikantem Zusammenhang mit Depressivität. Anders als erwartet war der berufliche Status positiv mit Depressivität assoziiert, während für den Tätigkeitsspielraum keine signifikanten Effekte nachweisbar waren. Das Pfadmodell bestätigte sowohl direkte als auch durch Überforderungserleben vermittelte Zusammenhänge zwischen den Tätigkeitsmerkmalen und Depressivität (39 % Varianzaufklärung). Die Ergebnisse bieten eine Grundlage für die Identifizierung potenzieller Risikofaktoren für das Auftreten depressiver Symptome am Arbeitsplatz.
This study examined the job characteristics in the Job-Demand-Control-Support Model and in the Effort-Reward Imbalance Model with regard to depression in a sample of 265 employees. First, we tested by means of confirmatory factor analysis similarities and differences of the two models. Secondly, job characteristics were introduced as predictors in a path model to test their relation with depression. Furthermore, we examined whether the associations were mediated by the experience of excessive demands. Our analyses showed the demand/effort component to be one common factor, while decision latitude and reward (subdivided into the three facets of job security, social recognition, and status-related reward) remained distinctive components. Employees with high job demands/effort, low job security, low social recognition, but high status-related rewards reported higher depression scores. Unexpectedly, status-related rewards were positively associated with depression, while we found no significant effects for decision latitude. The path models confirmed direct as well as mediation effects (through experienced excessive demands) between job characteristics and depression (39 % explained variance in depression). Our results could be useful to identify possible job-related risk factors for depression.
Literatur
1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173 – 1182.
(1987). Practical issues in structural equation modelling. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 78 – 117.
(1988). Work and depression among women in the Federal Republic of Germany. Women & Health, 14, 3 – 26.
(2001). Structural equation modelling with AMOS. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
(2004). Job strain, effort-reward imbalance, and stress at work: Competing or complementary models? Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 32, 84 – 93.
(2007). Job stress and depression symptoms in middle-aged workers – prospective results from the Belstress study. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 33 (4), 252 – 259.
(1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (1), 98 – 104.
(2000). Job strain, effort-reward imbalance and employee well-being: A large scale cross-sectional study. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 1317 – 1327.
(2003). Hormones, brain and stress. Endocrine Regulations, 37, 51 – 68.
(2002). Effects of chronic job insecurity and change in job security on self reported health, minor psychiatric morbidity, physiological measures, and health related behaviours in British civil servants: The Whitehall II study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 450 – 454.
(2005). A prospective study of cumulative job stress in relation to mental health [Electronic version]. BMC Public Health, 5 (67).
(1991). Von der Prävention zur Gesundheitsförderung durch Arbeitsgestaltung. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 35, 48 – 58.
(1995). Arbeitstätigkeitsanalyse: Analyse und Bewertung psychischer Arbeitsanforderungen. Heidelberg: Roland Asanger Verlag.
(1993). Allgemeine Depressionsskala, Manual. Göttingen: Beltz Test.
(1995). Evaluating model fit. In , Structural equation modelling. Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76 – 99). London: Sage.
(1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In , Structural equation models in mathematical psychology (Vol. II, pp. 85 – 112). New York: Seminar Press.
(1982). Recent developments in structural equation modelling. Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (4), 404 – 416.
(1979). Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285 – 308.
(1990). Healthy Work. Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.
(2001). Stress and health research. In , International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 15170 – 15175). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
(2003). Berufliche Gratifikationskrisen und depressive Symptome. Eine Querschnittsstudie bei Erwerbstätigen im mittleren Erwachsenenalter. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 53, 223 – 228.
(1974). A behavioral approach to depression. In , Psychology of Depression. Contemporary Theory and Research (pp. 157 – 178). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
(1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.
(2000). Psychosocial Work Environment and Depression: Epidemiologic Assessment of the Demand-Control Model. American Journal of Public Health, 90 (11), 1765 – 1770.
(1997). Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990 – 2020: Global burden of disease study. The Lancet, 349 (9064), 1498 – 1504.
(2002). Psychosocial factors at work, personality traits and depressive symptoms. British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 111 – 117.
(2002). Psychosocial work environment and psychological well-being: Assessment of the buffering effects in the job demand-control (-support) model in BELSTRESS. Stress & Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 18 (1), 43 – 56.
(2002). Berufliche Gratifikationskrisen und Gesundheit. Psychotherapeut, 47, 386 – 398.
(2004). Psychosocial factors at work and depression in three countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 1475 – 1482.
(1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385 – 401.
(1998). Belastung und Beanspruchung. Heidelberg: Asanger.
(2000). Das Erleben von Arbeitsintensität und Tätigkeitsspielraum – Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur orientierenden Analyse (FIT). Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 44, 129 – 139.
(2004). Fragebogen zur Messung beruflicher Gratifikationskrisen. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 227 – 238.
(1984). Das Belastungs-Beanspruchungs-Konzept. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 38, 193 – 200.
(1975). Arbeitswissenschaftliche Beurteilung der Belastung und Beanspruchung an unterschiedlichen industriellen Arbeitsplätzen. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Sozialordnung.
(2005). Psychosocial work environment and incidence of severe depressive symptoms: Prospective findings from a 5-year follow-up of the Danish Work Environment Cohort Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163 (10), 877 – 887.
(2005). Testing the Job Demand-Control-Support model with anxiety and depression as outcomes: The Hordaland Health Study. Occupational Medicine, 55, 463 – 473.
(2004). TICS – Trierer Inventar zum chronischen Stress. Manual. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(2006). Job stress interventions and the organization of work. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 32, 515 – 527.
(1996a). Adverse health effects of high effort – low reward conditions at work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 27 – 43.
(1996b). Soziale Krisen und Gesundheit. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(2004). The measurement of Effort-Reward Imbalance at work: European comparisons. Social Science and Medicine, 58 (8), 1483 – 1499.
(2005). Medizinische Soziologie. München: Elsevier, Urban & Fischer.
(1999). Work characteristics and psychiatric disorder in civil servants in London. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 49, 48 – 53.
(2007). Klassifikation der deutschen Wirtschaftszweige. Ausgabe 2003, www.statistik-portal.de/Statistik-Portal/klassiWZ03.pdf (vom 8. 11. 2007).
(2005). Gesundheitsreport 2005. Veröffentlichungen zum betrieblichen Gesundheitsmanagement der TK, Band 8 Hamburg: Techniker Krankenkasse.
(2002). Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, neuroendocrine factors and stress. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53, 865 – 871.
(2001). Association between job stress and depression among Japanese employees threatened by job loss in a comparison between two complementary job-stress models. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 27, 146 – 153.
(1999). SAA und SALSA: Zwei Fragebögen zur subjektiven Arbeitsanalyse. In , Handbuch psychologischer Arbeitsanalyseverfahren. Schriftenreihe Mensch-Technik-Organisation (Band 14). Zürich: Verlag der Fachvereine.
(2002). Testing global and specific indicators of rewards in the Effort-Reward Imbalance Model: Does it make any difference? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 403 – 421.
(2007). Work stress, mental health and antidepressant medication findings from the Health 2000 Study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 98, 189 – 197.
(2001). Perceived work stress and major depression in the Canadian employed population, 20 – 49 years old. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6 (4), 281 – 289.
(1987). Work, unemployment, and mental health. Oxford: Clarendon.
(in press ). Mediation testing in management research: A review and proposals. Organizational Research Methods.