Skip to main content
Original Article

Work-Related Smartphone Use and Well-Being in the Evening

The Role of Autonomous and Controlled Motivation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000114

Recent research has revealed that use of smartphones for work in the evening is associated with lower well-being. In this study, based on self-determination theory, we examined the role of autonomous and controlled motivation for well-being in the evening. Hierarchical regression analyses using data from 1,714 working individuals revealed that work-related smartphone usage in the evening was positively related to psychological detachment, but unrelated to recovery and negative affect, and negatively related to positive affect. Autonomous motivation for smartphone usage in the evening was positively related to recovery, psychological detachment, and positive affect. Controlled motivation was significantly related to positive and negative affect in the expected direction. These results indicate that the motivation behind individuals’ smartphone use in the evening matters for their well-being.

References

  • Binnewies, C. , Sonnentag, S. , & Mojza, E. (2009). Daily performance at work: Feeling recovered in the morning as a predictor of day-level job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 67–93. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bono, J. E. , & Judge, T. A. (2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 554–571. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boswell, W. R. , & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2007). The use of communication technologies after hours: The role of work attitudes and work-life conflict. Journal of Management, 33, 592–610. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chesley, N. (2005). Blurring boundaries? Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress, and family satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1237–1248. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Day, A. , Scott, N. , & Kelloway, E. K. (2010). Information and communication technology: Implications for job stress and employee well-being. In P. L. Perrewé, & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), New developments and conceptual approaches to job stress, Vol. 8, (pp. 317–350). Bingley, UK: Emerald. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L. , Connell, J. P. , & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 580–590. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L. , & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Diaz, I. , Chiaburu, D. S. , Zimmerman, R. D. , & Boswell, W. R. (2011). Communication technology: Pros and cons of constant connection to work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 500–508. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Etzion, D. , Eden, D. , & Lapidot, Y. (1998). Relief from job stressors and burnout: Reserve service as a respite. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 577–585. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grant, A. M. , Christianson, M. K. , & Price, R. H. (2007). Happiness, health, or relationships? Managerial practices and employee well-being tradeoffs. The Academy of Management Perspectives ARCHIVE, 21, 51–63. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hahn, V. C. , Binnewies, C. , Sonnentag, S. , & Mojza, E. J. (2011). Learning how to recover from job stress: Effects of a recovery training program on recovery, recovery-related self-efficacy, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 202–216. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krohne, H. W. , Egloff, B. , Kohlmann, C.-W. , & Tausch, A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der “Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (PANAS) [Studies using a German version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)]. Diagnostica, 42, 139–156. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lanaj, K. , Johnson, R. E. , & Barnes, C. M. (2014). Beginning the workday already depleted? Consequences of late-night smartphone use and sleep. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 124, 11–23. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laumer, S. , Maier, C. , Eckhardt, A. , & Weitzel, T. (2011, May). The trend is our friend: German IT personnel’s perception of job-related factors before, during and after the economic downturn. Paper presented at the 49th SIGMIS annual conference on computer personnel research, San Antonio, TX, USA. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maier, C. , Laumer, S. , & Eckhardt, A. (2012, December). Using user personality to explain the intention-behavior gap and changes in beliefs: A longitudinal analysis. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando, FL, USA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Matusik, S. F. , & Mickel, A. E. (2011). Embracing or embattled by converged mobile devices? Users’ experiences with a contemporary connectivity technology. Human Relations, 64, 1001–1030. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Middleton, C. A. , & Cukier, W. (2006). Is mobile email functional or dysfunctional? Two perspectives on mobile email usage. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 252–260. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Olson-Buchanan, J. B. , & Boswell, W. R. (2006). Blurring boundaries: Correlates of integration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 432–445. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parasuraman, S. , & Simmers, C. A. (2001). Type of employment, work-family conflict and well‐being: A comparative study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 551–568. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Park, Y. , Fritz, C. , & Jex, S. M. (2011). Relationships between work-home segmentation and psychological detachment from work: The role of communication technology use at home. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 457–467. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M. , MacKenzie, S. B. , Lee, J.-Y. , & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ragsdale, J. M. , Beehr, T. A. , Grebner, S. , & Han, K. (2011). An integrated model of weekday stress and weekend recovery of students. International Journal of Stress Management, 18, 153–180. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryan, M. R. , & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryan, R. M. , & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sheldon, K. M. , & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Not all personal goals are personal: Comparing autonomous and controlled motivation for goals as predictors of effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 546–557. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sheldon, K. M. , & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482–497. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sheldon, K. M. , Ryan, R. M. , & Reis, H. T. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1270–1279. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Siltaloppi, M. , Kinnunen, U. , Feldt, T. , & Tolvanen, A. (2011). Identifying patterns of recovery experiences and their links to psychological outcomes across one year. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 84, 877–888. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. (2001). Work, recovery activities, and individual well-being: A diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 196–210. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. , & Fritz, C. (2007). The recovery experience questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 204–221. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. , & Geurts, S. (2009). Methodological issues in recovery research. Current Perspectives in Job-Stress Recovery, 7, 1–36. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. , & Kruel, U. (2006). Psychological detachment from work during off-job time: The role of job stressors, job involvement, and recovery-related self-efficacy. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15, 197–217. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. , Niessen, C. , & Neff, A. (2012). Recovery: Non-work experiences that promote positive states. In K. S. Cameron, & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 867–881). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. , & Zijlstra, F. R. H. (2006). Job characteristics and off-job activities as predictors of need for recovery, well-being, and fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 330–350. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sparks, K. , Cooper, C. , Fried, Y. , & Shirom, A. (1997). The effects of hours of work on health: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 391–408. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Beek, I. , Hu, Q. , Schaufeli, W. B. , Taris, T. W. , & Schreurs, B. H. J. (2012). For fun, love, or money: What drives workaholic, engaged, and burned-out employees at work? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 61, 30–55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Beek, I. , Taris, T. W. , & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). Workaholic and work engaged employees: Dead ringers or worlds apart? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 468–482. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, D. , Clark, L. A. , & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar