Abstract
Zusammenfassung. Zielsetzung der Arbeit ist die Klärung der Relevanz der Schulfächer für die Struktur der akademischen Selbstwirksamkeit und für ihre Messung. Zwei chinesische Stichproben wurden mit einem Selbstwirksamkeitsgitter untersucht (Stichprobe A: N = 601 Studierende im Alter von 17 bis 25 Jahren; Stichprobe B: N = 485 Mittelschüler/-schülerinnen im Alter von 14 bis 17 Jahren). In Studie A bestätigten explorative und konfirmatorische Analysen die schulfachbezogene Faktorenstruktur. Differentielle Korrelationen zu schultestähnlichen Leistungsprüfungen belegten die konvergent-diskriminante Validität der fachspezifischen Selbstwirksamkeitserfassung. In Studie B konnte die Schulfachstruktur konfirmatorisch repliziert werden. Die psychometrischen Kennwerte des schulfachbezogenen Selbstwirksamkeitsgitters erwiesen sich als gut.
Abstract. This article aimed to shed light on the subject-tied structure of academic self-efficacy and on its economic assessment. Two samples were investigated (sample A: N = 601 Chinese students, 17 – 25 years old; sample B: N = 485 Chinese middle school students, 14 – 17 years old). Study A confirmed the subject-specific structure of academic self-efficacy via explorative and confirmatory factor analyses. Differential correlations with informal achievement tests evidenced convergent-divergent validity. Study B replicated conceptually the subject-tied structure. The psychometric properties of the newly developed grid to measure subject-specific academic self-efficacies proved to be good.
Literatur
2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19 users guide. Crafordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation.
(2011). Erfassung des Selbstkonzepts im mittleren Kindesalter: Validierung einer deutschen Version des SDQ I. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25,131 – 144.
(1999). The development of a college biology self-efficacy instrument for nonmajors. Science Education, 83, 397 – 408.
(1990). Multidimensional scales of perceived academic efficacy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
(1997). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
(2012). Ein Messinstrument zur Erfassung subjektiver Kompetenzerwartungen. Allgemeine Selbstwirksamkeit Kurzskala (ASKU). Mannheim: Gesis.
(1996). Evaluation of a short-form of Career Decision Making Self-Efficacy Scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 47 – 57.
(1998). Tests of the internal/external frames of reference model with subject-specific academic self-efficacy and frame-specific academic self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 102 – 110.
(2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1 – 40.
(2006). Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion. München: Pearson.
(2013). Impact of self efficacy on motivation and performance of employees. International Journal of Business and Management, 8, 80 – 88.
(2005). Self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of college student’s academic performance. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 197 – 204.
(1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1968). Personal causation. The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York, NY: Academic Press.
(1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York, NY: Plenum.
(2010). Erfassung rechtschreibbezogener Selbstwirksamkeit mittels fehlerartspezifischer Selbsteinschätzung. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript, Institut für Pädagogische Psychologie, Universität Hannover.
(2009). Academic self-efficacy and academic self-concept: Reconsidering structural relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 499 – 505.
(1994). Selbstwirksamkeit zur sportlichen Aktivität: Reliabilität und Validität eines neuen Meßinstruments. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 15, 141 – 154.
(1988).
(Exploratory factor analysis . In J. R. NesselroadeR. B. CattellEds., Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 231 – 258). New York, NY: Plenum.2009). Self-efficacy and smoking cessation: A meta analysis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23, 56 – 66.
(. Fachbezogene Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung. Zugriff am 12. 06. 2014. Verfügbar unter http://www.phil.uni-passau.de/fileadmin/group_upload/30/Schuelerfragebogen/Chemiestudie.pdf
1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179 – 185.
(1999). Cuttoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1 – 55.
(2012). Discriminant and incremental validity of self-concept and academic self-efficacy: A meta analysis. Educational Psychology, 32, 777 – 805.
(2014). Academic self-concept in science: Multidimensionality, relations to achievement measures, and gender differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 11 – 21.
(2002). Selbstwirksamkeit und Motivationsprozesse in Bildungsinstitutionen. Weinheim: Beltz.
(Hrsg.). (1999).
(Schulbezogene Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung . In R. SchwarzerM. JerusalemHrsg., Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen (S. 15 – 16). Berlin: Freie Universität.2014). Self-efficacy and achievement goals as motivational links between perceived contexts and achievement. Educational Psychology, 34, 92 – 117.
(2005). Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 341 – 363.
(2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 107 – 127.
(2012). Computer self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. Organizational and End User Computing, 24, 54 – 80.
(2014). Der Fragebogen zur Selbstwirksamkeit in der Erziehung. Diagnostica, 60, 35 – 45.
(2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
(2010).
(Selbstwirksamkeit . In D. H. RostHrsg., Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (4. Aufl., S. 767 – 774). Weinheim: Beltz.2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151 – 173.
(2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285 – 300.
(2003). Contraceptive self-efficacy: Does it influence adolescents’ contraceptive use? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 45 – 60.
(2005). The General Self-Efficacy Scale: Multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139, 439 – 457.
(1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84 – 99.
(1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129 – 149.
(1990). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 623 – 636.
(2007).
(Application of confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in sport/exercise psychology . In G. TenenbaumR. C. EklundEds., Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 774 – 798). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.1999). Separation of competency and affect components of multiple dimensions of academic self-concept: A developmental perspective. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 567 – 601.
(2005).
(Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modeling . In A. Maydeu-OlivaresJ. McArdleEds., Contemporary psychometrics. A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275 – 340). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralising Hu & Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320 – 341.
(2004). Die Genese akademischer Selbstkonzepte: Effekte dimensionaler und sozialer Vergleiche. Psychologische Rundschau, 55, 19 – 27.
(2000). Academic self-concept of talented students: Factor structure and applicability of the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 343 – 367.
(1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A Meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30 – 38.
(2003). Psychometric data on the Mathematics Self-Efficacy Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 128 – 138.
(2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396 – 402.
(2005). PISA 2003 Technical report. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
(1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543 – 578.
(2001).
(Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement . In R. RidingS. RaynerEds., Perception (pp. 239 – 266). London: Ablex.2014). Juxtaposing math self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of long-term achievement outcomes. Educational Psychology, 34, 29 – 48.
(2001). The structure of children’s perceived self-efficacy: A cross-national study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 87 – 97.
(2005).
(Schülermerkmale im Ländervergleich . In PISA-Konsortium DeutschlandHrsg., Pisa 2003. Der zweite Vergleich der Länder in Deutschland–was wissen und können Jugendliche? (S. 147 – 155). Münster: Waxmann.2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353 – 387.
(2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261 – 288.
(1997). Itempositionsveränderungen in Persönlichkeitsfragebogen: Methodischer Kunstfehler oder tolerierbare Praxis? Diagnostica, 2, 97 – 112.
(2007). Differentielles Leistungsangst Inventar (DAI). Handbuch (2. Aufl.). Frankfurt: Harcourt Test Services.
(2007). DISK-Gitter mit SKSLF-8. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(2006). Measuring general self-efficacy: A comparison of three measures using item response theory. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 66, 1047 – 1063.
(2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242 – 251.
(2007).
(Die Entwicklung des Kompetenzerlebens und die Wirksamkeit von Lernhilfen beim selbständigen Lösen kognitiv anspruchsvoller Physikaufgaben . In D. HöttekeHrsg., Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht im internationalen Vergleich (S. 379 – 381). Berlin: LIT.1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 173 – 208.
(. Health-specific self-efficacy scales. Zugriff am 12. 12. 2014. Verfügbar unter http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/helth/healself.pdf
1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407 – 444.
(1995). Self-efficacy, attributions, and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement: Grade level and achievement-level differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 386 – 398.
(2007). Zielorientierungen: Zur Relevanz der Schulfächer. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 39, 165 – 176.
(2004). Schulfachspezifische Interessen–ökonomisch gemessen. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 51, 213 – 220.
(2005). Leistungsängstlichkeit: Facetten, Fächer, Fachfacetten? Zur Trennbarkeit nach Angstfacette und Inhaltsbereich. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19, 225 – 236.
(2006). Blocked versus randomized format of questionnaires: A confirmatory multiple group analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 961 – 974.
(2007). Understanding the limits of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893 – 898.
(1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240 – 261.
(1994). The effect of graduate instruction in research methodology on research self-efficacy and perceived research utility. Rehabilitation Education, 8, 319 – 331.
(2010). Konstruktion und erste Validierung einer Skala zur Erfassung subjektiver schulischer Werte (SESSW). Diagnostica, 56, 195 – 211.
(2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 89 – 101.
(2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111 – 133.
(1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321 – 327.
(2013). Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning strategies for English language learners: Comparison between Chinese and German college students. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 3, 173 – 188.
(2002). Developmental characteristics of the general self-efficacy in middle school pupils. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science, 11, 214 – 215 (in Chinesisch).
(2001). Evidences for reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the General Self Efficacy Scale. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 7, 37 – 40 (in Chinesisch).
(2003). Selbstkonzept und Selbstwirksamkeit bei arbeitslosen AkademikerInnen. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit. Wien: Institut für Psychologie, Universität Wien.
(1995).
(Structural equation models with nonnormal variables . In R. H. HoyleEd., Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56 – 75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.2011). What are the most effective techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behavior–and are they the same? Health Education Research, 26, 308 – 322.
(1995). The significance of Brunswik-symmetry for psychological research and assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11, 59 – 60.
(2010). Strukturgleichungsmodelle. Operation und Anwendung in AMOS. Chongqing, CN: Chongqing Universitätsverlag (in Chinesisch).
(1995). Measuring optimistic self-beliefs: A Chinese adaptation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychologia, 38, 174 – 181.
(2010). An empirical study of university English learner’s self-efficacy cultivation. Foreign Language and Literature, 26 (5), 137 – 141 (in Chinesisch).
(2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82 – 91.
(