Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/a000132

Zusammenfassung. Zielsetzung der Arbeit ist die Klärung der Relevanz der Schulfächer für die Struktur der akademischen Selbstwirksamkeit und für ihre Messung. Zwei chinesische Stichproben wurden mit einem Selbstwirksamkeitsgitter untersucht (Stichprobe A: N = 601 Studierende im Alter von 17 bis 25 Jahren; Stichprobe B: N = 485 Mittelschüler/-schülerinnen im Alter von 14 bis 17 Jahren). In Studie A bestätigten explorative und konfirmatorische Analysen die schulfachbezogene Faktorenstruktur. Differentielle Korrelationen zu schultestähnlichen Leistungsprüfungen belegten die konvergent-diskriminante Validität der fachspezifischen Selbstwirksamkeitserfassung. In Studie B konnte die Schulfachstruktur konfirmatorisch repliziert werden. Die psychometrischen Kennwerte des schulfachbezogenen Selbstwirksamkeitsgitters erwiesen sich als gut.


Academic Self-Efficacy or Subject-Specific Self-Efficacies?

Abstract. This article aimed to shed light on the subject-tied structure of academic self-efficacy and on its economic assessment. Two samples were investigated (sample A: N = 601 Chinese students, 17 – 25 years old; sample B: N = 485 Chinese middle school students, 14 – 17 years old). Study A confirmed the subject-specific structure of academic self-efficacy via explorative and confirmatory factor analyses. Differential correlations with informal achievement tests evidenced convergent-divergent validity. Study B replicated conceptually the subject-tied structure. The psychometric properties of the newly developed grid to measure subject-specific academic self-efficacies proved to be good.

Literatur

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19 users guide. Crafordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Arens, A. K., Trautwein, U. & Hasselhorn, M. (2011). Erfassung des Selbstkonzepts im mittleren Kindesalter: Validierung einer deutschen Version des SDQ I. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25,131 – 144. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Baldwin J. A., Ebert-May, D. & Burns, D. J. (1999). The development of a college biology self-efficacy instrument for nonmajors. Science Education, 83, 397 – 408. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1990). Multidimensional scales of perceived academic efficacy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beierlein, C., Kovaleva, A., Kemper, C. J. & Rammstedt, B. (2012). Ein Messinstrument zur Erfassung subjektiver Kompetenzerwartungen. Allgemeine Selbstwirksamkeit Kurzskala (ASKU). Mannheim: Gesis. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Betz, N. E., Klein, K. L. & Taylor, K. M. (1996). Evaluation of a short-form of Career Decision Making Self-Efficacy Scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 47 – 57. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bong, M. (1998). Tests of the internal/external frames of reference model with subject-specific academic self-efficacy and frame-specific academic self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 102 – 110. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bong, M. & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1 – 40. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bühner, M. (2006). Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion. München: Pearson. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cherian, J. & Jacob, J. (2013). Impact of self efficacy on motivation and performance of employees. International Journal of Business and Management, 8, 80 – 88. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Choi, N. (2005). Self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of college student’s academic performance. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 197 – 204. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Comrey, A. L. & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York, NY: Plenum. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Faber, G. (2010). Erfassung rechtschreibbezogener Selbstwirksamkeit mittels fehlerartspezifischer Selbsteinschätzung. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript, Institut für Pädagogische Psychologie, Universität Hannover. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ferla, J., Valke, M. & Cai, Y. (2009). Academic self-efficacy and academic self-concept: Reconsidering structural relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 499 – 505. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fuchs, R. & Schwarzer, R. (1994). Selbstwirksamkeit zur sportlichen Aktivität: Reliabilität und Validität eines neuen Meßinstruments. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 15, 141 – 154. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). Exploratory factor analysis. In J. R. NesselroadeR. B. CattellEds., Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 231 – 258). New York, NY: Plenum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gwaltney, C. J., Metrik, J., Kahler, C. W. & Shiffman, S. (2009). Self-efficacy and smoking cessation: A meta analysis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23, 56 – 66. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hank, B. (o. J.). Fachbezogene Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung. Zugriff am 12. 06. 2014. Verfügbar unter http://www.phil.uni-passau.de/fileadmin/group_upload/30/Schuelerfragebogen/Chemiestudie.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179 – 185. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cuttoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1 – 55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huang, C. (2012). Discriminant and incremental validity of self-concept and academic self-efficacy: A meta analysis. Educational Psychology, 32, 777 – 805. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jansen, M., Schroeders, U. & Lüdtke, O. (2014). Academic self-concept in science: Multidimensionality, relations to achievement measures, and gender differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 11 – 21. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jerusalem, M. & Hopf, D. (Hrsg.). (2002). Selbstwirksamkeit und Motivationsprozesse in Bildungsinstitutionen. Weinheim: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jerusalem, M. & Satow, L. (1999). Schulbezogene Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung. In R. SchwarzerM. JerusalemHrsg., Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen (S. 15 – 16). Berlin: Freie Universität. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jiang, Y., Song, J., Lee, M. & Bong, M. (2014). Self-efficacy and achievement goals as motivational links between perceived contexts and achievement. Educational Psychology, 34, 92 – 117. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, T. L. & Prinz, J. (2005). Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 341 – 363. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Judge, T. A., Jackson, C., Shaw, J., Scott, B. A. & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 107 – 127. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karsten, R. & Schmidt, D. (2012). Computer self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. Organizational and End User Computing, 24, 54 – 80. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kliem, S., Kessemeier, Y., Heinrichs, N., Döpfner, M. & Hahlweg, K. (2014). Der Fragebogen zur Selbstwirksamkeit in der Erziehung. Diagnostica, 60, 35 – 45. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Köller, O. & Möller, J. (2010). Selbstwirksamkeit. In D. H. RostHrsg., Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (4. Aufl., S. 767 – 774). Weinheim: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G. & Widaman K. E. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151 – 173. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K. & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285 – 300. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Longmore, M. A., Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C. & Rudolph, J. L. (2003). Contraceptive self-efficacy: Does it influence adolescents’ contraceptive use? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 45 – 60. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U. & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The General Self-Efficacy Scale: Multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139, 439 – 457. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacCallum, R., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S. & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84 – 99. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129 – 149. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1990). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 623 – 636. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (2007). Application of confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in sport/exercise psychology. In G. TenenbaumR. C. EklundEds., Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 774 – 798). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. & Debus, R. (1999). Separation of competency and affect components of multiple dimensions of academic self-concept: A developmental perspective. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 567 – 601. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K-T. & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modeling. In A. Maydeu-OlivaresJ. McArdleEds., Contemporary psychometrics. A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275 – 340). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T. & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralising Hu & Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320 – 341. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Möller, J. & Köller, O. (2004). Die Genese akademischer Selbstkonzepte: Effekte dimensionaler und sozialer Vergleiche. Psychologische Rundschau, 55, 19 – 27. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Mui, F. L., Yeung, A. S., Low, R. & Jin, P. (2000). Academic self-concept of talented students: Factor structure and applicability of the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 343 – 367. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Multon, K. D., Brown, A. D. & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A Meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30 – 38. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nielsen, I. L. & Moore, K. A. (2003). Psychometric data on the Mathematics Self-Efficacy Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 128 – 138. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396 – 402. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • OECD (2005). PISA 2003 Technical report. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543 – 578. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pajares, F. & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. RidingS. RaynerEds., Perception (pp. 239 – 266). London: Ablex. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Parker, P. D., Marsh H. W., Ciarrochi, J., Marshall, S. & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2014). Juxtaposing math self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of long-term achievement outcomes. Educational Psychology, 34, 29 – 48. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pastorelli, C., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Rola, J., Rozsa, S. & Bandura, A. (2001). The structure of children’s perceived self-efficacy: A cross-national study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 87 – 97. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Pekrun, R., Frenzl, A. C., Zimmer, K. & Lichtenfeld, S. (2005). Schülermerkmale im Ländervergleich. In PISA-Konsortium DeutschlandHrsg., Pisa 2003. Der zweite Vergleich der Länder in Deutschland–was wissen und können Jugendliche? (S. 147 – 155). Münster: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Richardson, M., Abraham, C. & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353 – 387. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robbins, S. B, Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R. & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261 – 288. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rost, D. H. & Hoberg, K. (1997). Itempositionsveränderungen in Persönlichkeitsfragebogen: Methodischer Kunstfehler oder tolerierbare Praxis? Diagnostica, 2, 97 – 112. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rost, D. H. & Schermer, F. J. (2007). Differentielles Leistungsangst Inventar (DAI). Handbuch (2. Aufl.). Frankfurt: Harcourt Test Services. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rost, D. H., Sparfeldt, J. R. & Schilling, S. (2007). DISK-Gitter mit SKSLF-8. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scherbaum, C. A., Cohen-Charash, Y. & Kern, M. J. (2006). Measuring general self-efficacy: A comparison of three measures using item response theory. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 66, 1047 – 1063. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scholz, U., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., Sud, S. & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242 – 251. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schröter, E. & Erb, R. (2007). Die Entwicklung des Kompetenzerlebens und die Wirksamkeit von Lernhilfen beim selbständigen Lösen kognitiv anspruchsvoller Physikaufgaben. In D. HöttekeHrsg., Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht im internationalen Vergleich (S. 379 – 381). Berlin: LIT. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 173 – 208. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarzer, R. & Renner, B. (o. J.). Health-specific self-efficacy scales. Zugriff am 12. 12. 2014. Verfügbar unter http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/helth/healself.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J. & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407 – 444. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shell, D., Colvin, C. & Bruning, R. H. (1995). Self-efficacy, attributions, and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement: Grade level and achievement-level differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 386 – 398. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sparfeldt, J. R., Buch, S. R., Wirthwein, L. & Rost, D. H. (2007). Zielorientierungen: Zur Relevanz der Schulfächer. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 39, 165 – 176. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Sparfeldt, J. R., Rost, D. H. & Schilling, S. R. (2004). Schulfachspezifische Interessen–ökonomisch gemessen. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 51, 213 – 220. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sparfeldt, J. R., Schilling, S. R., Rost, D. H., Stelzl, I. & Peipert, D. (2005). Leistungsängstlichkeit: Facetten, Fächer, Fachfacetten? Zur Trennbarkeit nach Angstfacette und Inhaltsbereich. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19, 225 – 236. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Sparfeldt, J. R., Schilling, S. R., Rost, D. H. & Thiel, A. (2006). Blocked versus randomized format of questionnaires: A confirmatory multiple group analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 961 – 974. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limits of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893 – 898. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stajkovic, A. D. & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240 – 261. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Szymanski, E. M., Whitney-Thomas, J., Marshall, L. & Sayger, T. V. (1994). The effect of graduate instruction in research methodology on research self-efficacy and perceived research utility. Rehabilitation Education, 8, 319 – 331. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steinmayr, R. & Spinath, B. (2010). Konstruktion und erste Validierung einer Skala zur Erfassung subjektiver schulischer Werte (SESSW). Diagnostica, 56, 195 – 211. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Usher, E. L. & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 89 – 101. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Valentine, J. C., DeBois, D. L. & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111 – 133. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321 – 327. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, C., Schwab, G., Fenn, P. & Chang, M. (2013). Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning strategies for English language learners: Comparison between Chinese and German college students. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 3, 173 – 188. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, C.-k. (2002). Developmental characteristics of the general self-efficacy in middle school pupils. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science, 11, 214 – 215 (in Chinesisch). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, C.-k., Hu, Z.-f. & Liu, Y. (2001). Evidences for reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the General Self Efficacy Scale. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 7, 37 – 40 (in Chinesisch). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wenninger, O. D. (2003). Selbstkonzept und Selbstwirksamkeit bei arbeitslosen AkademikerInnen. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit. Wien: Institut für Psychologie, Universität Wien. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • West, S. G., Finch, J. F. & Curran, P. L. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables. In R. H. HoyleEd., Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56 – 75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, S. L. & French, D. P. (2011). What are the most effective techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behavior–and are they the same? Health Education Research, 26, 308 – 322. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wittmann, W. W. (1995). The significance of Brunswik-symmetry for psychological research and assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11, 59 – 60. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Wu, M. (2010). Strukturgleichungsmodelle. Operation und Anwendung in AMOS. Chongqing, CN: Chongqing Universitätsverlag (in Chinesisch). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, J. X. & Schwarzer, R. (1995). Measuring optimistic self-beliefs: A Chinese adaptation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychologia, 38, 174 – 181. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, Q.-Z. & Wu, X.-Y. (2010). An empirical study of university English learner’s self-efficacy cultivation. Foreign Language and Literature, 26 (5), 137 – 141 (in Chinesisch). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82 – 91. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar