Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000030

Zusammenfassung. Der Self-Description Questionnaire I (SDQ I; Marsh, 1990b) gehört zu den am ausführlichsten empirisch evaluierten Verfahren zur Erfassung eines multidimensionalen Selbstkonzepts im mittleren Kindesalter. Die vorliegende Arbeit stellt eine deutschsprachige Version dieses Instruments vor. Die psychometrischen Eigenschaften des deutschen SDQ I wurden an N = 589 Schülern der Klassenstufen drei bis sechs untersucht. Es zeigte sich, dass sich die Mehrheit der Skalen des vorgestellten Verfahrens zur reliablen und validen Erfassung eines inhaltlich ausdifferenzierten Selbstkonzepts bei Kindern eignet. Validitätseinschränkungen ergaben sich hingegen für das über Selbsteinschätzungen zum Lesen erfasst verbale Selbstkonzept, das nicht deutlicher mit der Deutschnote korrelierte (r = .32) als das akademische Selbstkonzept für verschiedene Schulfächer (r = .38). Außerdem sprachen die Befunde dafür, dass beim akademischen Selbstkonzept neben einem verbalen und mathematischen Bereich auch zwischen einem Kompetenz- und Affektbereich zu unterscheiden ist. Damit liefert die hier vorgestellte deutsche Version des SDQ I wichtige Erkenntnisse über die multidimensionale Selbstkonzeptstruktur in der mittleren Kindheit.


Self-Concept Measurement with Preadolescent Children: Validation of a German Version of the SDQ I

Abstract. The Self-Description Questionnaire I (SDQ I; Marsh, 1990b) is known as the most validated instrument to measure the multidimensional self-concept of preadolescent children. A German version of the SDQ I is introduced in this study. Its psychometric properties were examined in a sample of N = 589 students of grades 3 to 6. The majority of the scales were proven as reliable and valid in order to measure content-specific facets of self-concept of preadolescents. Validity restrictions, however, emerged for the verbal part of academic self-concept assessed by reading self-concept. Reading self-concept showed similar correlations to students’ grades in German (r = .32) as general school self-concept (r = .38). Additionally, next to the separation of academic self-concept into a verbal and a math factor, academic self-concept was proven to be further differentiable into competence and affect components. Thus, the results of the German version of the SDQ I reported here make several important suggestions about the structure of self-concept with preadolescent children.

Literatur

  • Asendorpf, J. B. , van Aken, M. A. G. (1993). Deutsche Version der Selbstkonzeptskalen von Harter. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie , 25, 64–86. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandalos, D. L. , Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In: G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269–296). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bong, M. , Clark, R. E. (1999). Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educational Psychologist , 34, 139–153. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bortz, J. (1999). Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler. Berlin: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (1996a). Academic self-concept: Its structure, measurement, and relation to academic achievement. In: B. A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: developmental, social, and clinical considerations (pp. 287–316). New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (1996b). Measuring self-concept across the life span: Issues and instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. , Shavelson, R. J. (1996). On the structure of social self-concept for pre-, early, and late adolescents: A test of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 70, 599–613. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harter, S. (1985). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Children: Revision of the Perceived Competence Scale for Children. Denver, CO. University of Denver. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation Modeling. New York: The Guildford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Köller, O. (2004). Konsequenzen von Leistungsgruppierungen. Münster: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H.W. (1986a). Negative item bias in rating scales for preadolescent children: A cognitive-developmental phenomenon. Developmental Psychology , 22, 37–49. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1986b). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal , 23, 129–149. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1990a). Influences of internal and external frames of reference on the formation of math and English self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology , 82, 107–116. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1990b). Self Description Questionnaire – I (SDQ I). Manual. Macarthur, N.S.W. Australia: University of Western Sydney. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1990c). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology , 82, 623–636. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1993a). Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement, and research. In: J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self. The self in social perspective. (Volume 3, pp. 59–98). Hillsdale, NJ & London: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1993b). The multidimensional structure of academic self-concept: Invariance over gender and age. American Educational Research Journal , 30, 841–860. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. , Byrne, B. M. , Shavelson, R. J. (1988). A multifaceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology , 80, 336–380. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. , Craven, R. G. (1991). Self-other agreement on multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept: Inferences by teachers, mothers, and fathers. Journal of Educational Psychology , 83, 393–404. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. , Craven, R. G. (2005). A reciprocal effects model of the causal ordering of self-concept and achievement. In: H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven & D. M. McInerney (Eds.), International advances in self research: New frontiers for self-research (pp. 17–51). Greenwich, Conn.: Information Age Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. , Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective. Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science , 1, 133–163. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. , Craven, R. , Debus, R. (1999). Separation of competency and affect components of multiple dimensions of academic self-concept: A developmental perspective. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly , 45, 567–601. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. , Gouverent, P. J. (1989). Multidimensional self-concepts and perceptions of control: Construct validation of responses by children. Journal of Educational Psychology , 81, 57–69. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. , Hattie, J. (1996). Theoretical perspectives on the structure of self-concept. In: B. A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social, and clinical considerations (pp. 38–90). New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. , Hau, K.-T. (2004). Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concepts and achievements: Cross-cultural generalizability of the internal/external frame of reference predictions across 26 countries. Journal of Educational Psychology , 96, 56–67. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. , Kong, C.-K. , Hau, K.-T. (2001). Extension of the internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept formation: Importance of native and nonnative languages for Chinese students. Journal of Educational Psychology , 93, 453–553. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. , MacDonald-Holmes, I. W. (1990). Multidimensional self-concepts: Construct validation of responses of children. American Educational Research Journal , 27, 89–117. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. , O’Mara, A. J. (2008). Self-Concept is as multidisciplinary as it is multidimensional. In: H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven & D. M. McInerney (Eds.), Self-processes, learning, and enabling human potential. Dynamic new approaches (pp. 87–115). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. , Relich, J. D. , Smith, I. D. (1983). Self-concept: The construct validity of interpretations based upon the SDQ. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 45, 173–187. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. , Smith, I. D. , Barnes, J. (1985). Multidimensional self-concepts: Relations with sex and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology , 77, 581–596. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. , Yeung, A. S. (1997). Coursework selection: Relations to academic self-concept and achievement. American Educational Research Journal , 34, 691–720. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Möller, J. , Pohlmann, B. , Köller, O. , Marsh, H. W. (2009). Meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept. Review of Educational Research , 79, 1129–1167. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. , Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus 5[Computer software] . Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. statmodel.com. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schöne, C. , Dickhäuser, O. , Spinath, B. , Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2002). Skalen zur Erfassung des schulischen Fähigkeitsselbstkonzepts (SESSKO). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwanzer, A. D. , Trautwein, U. , Lüdtke, O. , Sydow, H. (2005). Entwicklung eines Instruments zur Erfassung des Selbstkonzepts junger Erwachsener. Diagnostica , 51, 183–194. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Shavelson, R. J. , Hubner, J. J. , Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Journal of Educational Research , 46, 407–441. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Souvignier, E. , Trenk-Hinterberger, I. , Adam-Schwebe, S. , Gold, A. (2008). Frankfurter Leseverständnistest für 5. und 6. Klassen (FLVT 5–6) . Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Trautwein, U. (2003). Schule und Selbstwert. Entwicklungsverlauf, Bedeutung von Kontextfaktoren und Effekte auf die Verhaltensebene. Münster: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Valentine, J. C. , DuBois, D. L. , Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist , 39, 111–131. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar