Skip to main content

Children’s Phonological Awareness as a Predictor of Reading and Spelling

A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Research in German-Speaking Countries

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/a000141

Abstract. Numerous observational and experimental studies have shown that phonological awareness relates to reading and spelling. However, most studies were conducted in English-speaking countries, neglecting the issue of the generalizability of the findings across different orthographies. This meta-analysis focused exclusively on studies from German-speaking countries and explored how measures of phonological awareness relate longitudinally to reading and spelling. It summarized 19 manuscripts reporting the results of 21 independent studies. Results indicated a mean effect size of Zr = 0.318 (r = .308) for the relation between phonological awareness and later reading and spelling. Moderator analyses showed that phonological awareness on the rhyme level was less related to reading and spelling than phonological awareness on the phoneme level. Furthermore, the predictive power of phonological awareness remained substantial even for children beyond the second grade. The findings suggest that research on reading and spelling development should take into account the characteristics of German orthography.


Die Bedeutsamkeit der phonologischen Bewusstheit in der Vorhersage schriftsprachlicher Kompetenzen im Deutschen: Ein systematischer Literaturüberblick längsschnittlicher Studien

Zusammenfassung. Zusammenhänge von phonologischer Bewusstheit mit der Lese- und Rechtschreibkompetenz konnten vielfach nachgewiesen werden. Dennoch ist ein deutlicher Überhang an Studien aus englischsprachigen Ländern zu erkennen. Die Frage der Generalisierbarkeit dieser Befunde für das Deutsche bleibt dabei unklar. Die vorliegende Meta-Analyse zur Frage der prädiktiven Bedeutsamkeit der phonologischen Bewusstheit für den Schriftspracherwerb fokussiert daher exklusiv auf empirische Arbeiten aus dem deutschen Sprachraum. Insgesamt wurden 19 Arbeiten, die Ergebnisse von 21 unabhängigen Studien berichten, zusammengefasst. Die Ergebnisse zeigen einen mittleren Effekt in Höhe von Zr = .318 (r = .308). Moderatoranalysen machen deutlich, dass die phonologische Bewusstheit im weiteren Sinne (Silben-bzw. Reimebene) weniger hoch mit den späteren Lese- und Rechtschreibfähigkeiten korreliert als die phonologische Bewusstheit im engeren Sinne (Phonemebene). Auch über die zweite Klassenstufe hinaus korreliert die phonologische Bewusstheit mit den schriftsprachlichen Kompetenzen. Die Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass Charakteristika der deutschen Orthographie in der Forschung zum Schriftspracherwerb beachtet werden sollten.

References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.

References

  • Anthony, J. L., & Francis, D. J. (2005). Development of phonological awareness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 255 – 259. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00376.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Anthony, J. L., & Lonigan, C. J. (2004). The nature of phonological awareness: Converging evidence from four studies of preschool and early grade school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 43 – 55. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.43 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ball, E. W. (1993). Phonological awareness. Reading and Writing, 5, 141 – 159. doi:10.1007/BF01027481 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barron, R. W. (1991). Proto-literacy, literacy and the acquisition of phonological awareness. Learning and Individual Differences, 3, 243 – 255. doi:10.1016/1041-6080(91)90010-X First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barth, K., & Gomm, B. (2008). Gruppentest zur Früherkennung von Lese- und Rechtschreibschwierigkeiten. Phonologische Bewusstheit bei Kindergartenkindern und Schulanfängern (PB-LRS) [A group testing procedure for the early diagnosis of reading and spelling difficulties: Phonological awareness in preschool children and children starting school]. In W. SchneiderH. MarxM. HasselhornEds., Diagnostik von Rechtschreibleistungen und -kompetenz (pp. 7 – 43). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, T. (2012). Einführung in die Phonetik und Phonologie des Deutschen [An introduction to German phonetics and phonology]. Darmstadt, Germany: WBG Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Blaser, R. (2002). Erprobung und Validierung des Konzeptes “Phonologische Bewusstheit” in der Frühdiagnostik und Prävention späterer Lesestörungen an einer Stichprobe Schweizer Kinder [Testing and validating the concept of phonological awareness for the early diagnosis and prevention of later reading difficulties in a sample of Swiss children] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universität Bern, Switzerland. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Blatter, K., Faust, V., Jäger, D., Schöppe, D., Artelt, C., Schneider, W., & Stanat, P. (2013). Vorschulische Förderung der phonologischen Bewusstheit und der Buchstaben-Laut-Zuordnung: Profitieren auch Kinder nichtdeutscher Herkunftssprache? [How effective is a preschool training of phonological awareness and letter sound correspondence for student’s with migration background?]. In A. RedderS. WeinertEds., Sprachförderung und Sprachdiagnostik: Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven (pp. 218 – 238). Münster, Germany: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Borgwaldt, S. R., Hellwig, F. M., & Groot, A. M. B. d. (2005). Onset entropy matters: Letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages. Reading and Writing, 18, 211 – 229. doi:10.1007/s11145-005-3001-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1978). Difficulties in auditory organisation as a possible cause of reading backwardness. Nature, 271, 746 – 747. doi:10.1038/271746a0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419 – 421. doi:10.1038/301419a0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caravolas, M. (2004). Spelling development in alphabetic writing systems: A cross-linguistic perspective. European Psychologist, 9, 3 – 14. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.9.1.3 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Mousikou, P., Efrim, C., Litavský, M., Onochie-Quintanilla, E., & … Hulme, C. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23, 678 – 686. doi:10.1177/0956797611434536 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cardoso-Martins, C. (1995). Sensitivity to rhymes, syllables and phonemes in literacy acquisition in Portuguese. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 808 – 828. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caspi, A., & Roberts, B. W. (1999). Personality continuity and change across the life course. In L. A. PervinO. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 300 – 326). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition, 91, 77 – 111. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00164-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155 – 159. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DeFrancis, J. (1989). Visible speech. The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ebert, S., & Weinert, S. (2013). Predicting reading literacy in primary school: The contribution of various language indicators in preschool. In M. PfostC. ArteltS. WeinertEds., The development of reading literacy from early childhood to adolescence: Empirical findings from the Bamberg BiKS longitudinal studies (pp. 93 – 149). Bamberg, Germany: University of Bamberg Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250 – 287. doi:10.1598/RRQ.36.3.2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Ennemoser, M., Marx, P., Weber, J., & Schneider, W. (2012). Spezifische Vorläuferfertigkeiten der Lesegeschwindigkeit, des Leseverständnisses und des Rechtschreibens. Evidenz aus zwei Längsschnittstudien vom Kindergarten bis zur 4. Klasse [Specific precursors of decoding speed, reading comprehension, and spelling: Evidence from two longitudinal studies from kindergarten to Grade 4]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 44, 53 – 67. doi:10.1026/0049-8637/a000057 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Fischer, M. Y., & Pfost, M. (2015). Wie effektiv sind Maßnahmen zur Förderung der phonologischen Bewusstheit? Eine meta-analytische Untersuchung der Auswirkungen deutschsprachiger Trainingsprogramme auf den Schriftspracherwerb. [How effective are trainings of phonological awareness? A meta-analysis of German language training programs and their effects on the acquisition of reading and spelling skills]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 47, 35 – 51. doi: 10.1026/0049-8637/a000121 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Fricke, S., Stackhouse, J., & Wells, B. (2007). Phonologische Bewusstheitsfähigkeiten deutschsprachiger Vorschulkinder–eine Pilotstudie [Phonological awareness skills in German-speaking children: Test development and first comparative data]. Forum Logopädie, 21, 14 – 19. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Fricke, S., Szcerbinski, M., Stackhouse, J., & Fox-Boyer, A. V. (2008). Predicting individual differences in early literacy acquisition in German. Written Language & Literacy, 11, 103 – 146. doi:10.1075/wll.11.2.02fri First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frost, J. (2001). Phonemic awareness, spontaneous writing, and reading and spelling development from a preventive perspective. Reading and Writing, 14, 487 – 513. doi:10.1023/A:1011143002068 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., & Papadopoulos, T. C. (2008). Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 566 – 580. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.566 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Goldammer, A. von, Mähler, C., Bockmann, A.-K., & Hasselhorn, M. (2010). Vorhersage früher Schriftsprachleistungen aus vorschulischen Kompetenzen der Sprache und der phonologischen Informationsverarbeitung [Prediction of reading and spelling from preschool competencies in language and phonological information processing]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 42, 48 – 56. doi:10.1026/0049-8637/a000005 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Goswami, U. (1999). Causal connections in beginning reading: The importance of rhyme. Journal of Research in Reading, 22, 217 – 240. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.00087 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. E. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, UK: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., & Richardson, U. (2005). The effects of spelling consistency on phonological awareness: A comparison of English and German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 345 – 365. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.06.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Grube, D., & Hasselhorn, M. (2006). Längsschnittliche Analysen zur Lese-, Rechtschreib- und Mathematikleistung im Grundschulalter: zur Rolle von Vorwissen, Intelligenz, phonologischen Arbeitsgedächtnis und phonologischer Bewusstheit [Longitudinal analyses of reading, spelling and mathematics achievement in primary school age: The role of prior knowledge, intelligence, phonological working memory and phonological awareness]. In I. HosenfeldF.-W. SchraderEds., Schulische Leistung. Grundlagen, Bedingungen, Perspektiven (pp. 87 – 105). Münster, Germany: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hanley, R., Masterson, J., Spencer, L. H., & Evans, D. (2004). How long do the advantages of learning to read a transparent orthography last? An investigation of the reading skills and reading impairment of Welsh children at 10 years of age. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 57, 1393 – 1410. doi:10.1080/02724980343000819 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoien, T., Lundberg, I., Stanovich, K. E., & Bjaalid, I.-K. (1995). Components of phonological awareness. Reading and Writing, 7, 171 – 188. doi:10.1007/BF01027184 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ise, E., Engel, R. E., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2012). Was hilft bei Lese-Rechtschreibstörung? Ergebnisse einer Metaanalyse zur Wirksamkeit deutschsprachiger Förderansätze [Effective treatment of dyslexia: A meta-analysis of German-language intervention studies]. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 21, 122 – 136. doi:10.1026/0942-5403/a000077 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • *Jansen, H. (1992). Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung lautsynthetischer Verarbeitungsprozesse im Vorschul- und frühen Grundschulalter [Studies on the development of sound synthesis processes in preschool and early school age]. Egelsbach, Germany: Verlag Hänsel-Hohenhausen. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437 – 447. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243 – 255. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.243 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. FrostL. KatzEds., Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67 – 84). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kirby, J., Georgiou, G. K., Martinussen, R., & Parrila, R. (2010). Naming speed and reading: From prediction to instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 341 – 362. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.3.4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Klicpera, C., Ehgartner, M., Gasteiger-Klicpera, B., & Schabmann, A. (1993). Voraussetzungen für das Lesenlernen bei lernbehinderten Kindern in der Sonderschule und bei guten und schwachen Lesern in der Grundschule: Eine Längsschnittuntersuchung zur Entwicklung des phonematischen Bewußtseins in der ersten Schulstufe [Prerequisites of reading development in students with learning difficulties in special education schools and good as well as poor readers in primary school: A longitudinal study on the development of phonemic awareness in first grade]. Heilpädagogische Forschung, 19, 104 – 109. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Klicpera, C., & Gasteiger-Klicpera, B. (1993). Lesen und Schreiben: Entwicklung und Schwierigkeiten [Reading and writing: Development and difficulties]. Bern, Switzerland: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Klicpera, C., & Gasteiger-Klicpera, B. (1998). Die ersten Stadien der Entwicklung von Lese- und Rechtschreibschwierigkeiten [First stages in the development of reading and spelling problems]. Heilpädagogische Forschung, 24, 163 – 175. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Krajewski, K., Schneider, W., & Nieding, G. (2008). Zur Bedeutung von Arbeitsgedächtnis, Intelligenz, phonologischer Bewusstheit und früher Mengen-Zahlen-Kompetenz beim Übergang vom Kindergarten in die Grundschule [On the importance of working memory, intelligence, phonological awareness, and early quantity-number-competencies for the successful transition from kindergarten to primary school]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 55, 100 – 113. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Küspert, P., & Schneider, W. (2008). Hören, lauschen, lernen. Sprachspiele für Kinder im Vorschulalter. Würzburger Trainingsprogramm zur Vorbereitung auf den Erwerb der Schriftsprache [The Würzburg preschool training programme to promote children’s reading acquisition] (6th ed.). Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Landerl, K., Linortner, R., & Wimmer, H. (1992). Phonologische Bewusstheit und Schriftspracherwerb im Deutschen [Phonological awareness and spelling acquisition in German]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 6, 17 – 33. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Landerl, K., Ramus, F., Moll, K., Lyytinen, H., Leppänen, P. H. T., Lohvansuu, K., & … Schulte-Körne, G. (2013). Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying complexity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 686 – 694. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12029 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Landerl, K., & Thaler, V. (2006). Reading and spelling acquisition and dyslexia in German. In R. M. JoshiP. G. AaronEds., Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 121 – 134). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (1994). Phonologische Bewusstheit als Prädiktor für Lese- und Schreibfertigkeiten in der Grundschule [Phonological awareness as predictor for reading and spelling abilities after two, three and four years of reading instruction]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 8, 153 – 164. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150 – 161. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.150 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315 – 334. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00005-X First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Lenel, A. (2005). Schrifterwerb im Vorschulalter [Reading development in preschool age]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Liberman, I. Y., & Shankweiler, D. (1985). Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 8 – 17. doi:10.1177/074193258500600604 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201 – 212. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(74)90101-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lonigan, C. J. (2006). Conceptualizing phonological processing skills in prereaders. In D. K. DickinsonS. B. NeumanEds., Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 77 – 89). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mann, V., & Wimmer, H. (2002). Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing, 15, 653 – 682. doi:10.1023/A:1020984704781 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Martschinke, S., Kirschhock, E.-M., & Frank, A. (2004). Der Rundgang durch Hörhausen. Erhebungsverfahren zur phonologischen Bewusstheit [The tour of Hörhausen: A phonological awareness test]. Donauwörth, Germany: Auer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Marx, H. (1991). Entwicklungsbedingte Verarbeitungsunterschiede bei phonologischen Syntheseaufgaben [Developmental differences in processing phonological synthesis tasks]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 330 – 349. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Mayringer, H., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Die Vorhersage früher Lese- und Rechtschreibschwierigkeiten: Phonologische Schwächen als Prädiktoren [The prediction of early reading and spelling difficulties: Phonological deficits as predictors]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 30, 57 – 69. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S.-A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322 – 352. doi:10.1037/a0026744 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moll, K., Ramus, F., Bartling, J., Bruder, J., Kunze, S., Neuhoff, N., & … Landerl, K. (2014). Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies. Learning and Instruction, 29, 65 – 77. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40, 665 – 681. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.665 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Taylor, S. (1998). Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 3 – 27. doi:10.1006/jecp.1998.2453 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Näslund, J. C., & Schneider, W. (1996). Kindergarten letter knowledge, phonological skills, and memory processes: Relative effects on early literacy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 30 – 59. doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.0021 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Nicolussi, B. (1999). Phonologische Fertigkeiten und Schriftspracherwerb. Die Vorhersage früher Lese- und Rechtschreibschwierigkeiten mit Hilfe phonologischer Prädiktoren [Phonological abilities and literacy development. The prediction of early reading and writing difficulties by phonological predictors] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universität Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Niklas, F., Möllers, K., & Schneider, W. (2013). Die frühe familiäre Lernumwelt als Mediator zwischen strukturellen Herkunftsmerkmalen und der basalen Lesefähigkeit am Ende der ersten Klasse [The early learning environment provided by the family as a mediator between structural family background and basic reading abilities at the end of Grade 1]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 60, 94 – 111. doi:10.2378/peu2013.art08d First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. SnowlingC. HulmeEds., The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227 – 247). Malden, MA: Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pfost, M., Hattie, J., Dörfler, T., & Artelt, C. (2014). Individual differences in reading development: A review of 25 years of empirical research on Matthew effects in reading. Review of Educational Research, 84, 203 – 244. doi:10.3102/0034654313509492 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Phillips, B. M., & Torgesen, J. K. (2006). Phonemic awareness and reading: Beyond the growth of initial reading accuracy. In D. K. DickinsonS. B. NeumanEds., Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 101 – 112). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Plume, E., & Schneider, W. (2004). Hören, lauschen, lernen 2. Spiele mit Buchstaben und Lauten für Kinder im Vorschulalter. Würzburger Buchstaben-Laut-Training [The Würzburg preschool training programme for promoting children’s reading acquisition including a training of letter-sound correspondence]. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rittle-Johnson, B., & Siegler, R. S. (1999). Learning to spell: Variability, choice, and change in children’s strategy use. Child Development, 70, 332 – 348. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00025 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scarborough, H. S. (1991). Antecedents to reading disability: Preschool language development and literacy experiences of children from dyslexic families. Reading and Writing, 3, 219 – 233. doi:10.1007/BF00354959 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities. Phonological awareness and some other promising factors. In B. K. ShapiroP. J. AccardoA. J. CaputeEds., Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 75 – 119). Timonium, MD: York Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scarborough, H. S. (2002). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. B. NeumanD. K. DickinsonEds., Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97 – 110). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, W. (2009). The development of reading and spelling. Relevant precursors, developmental changes, and individual differences. In W. SchneiderM. BullockEds., Human development from early childhood to early adulthood: Findings from a 20 year longitudinal study (pp. 199 – 220). New York: Taylor & Francis. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, W., Küspert, P., Roth, E., Visé, M., & Marx, H. (1997). Short- and long-term effects of training phonological awareness in kindergarten: Evidence from two German studies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 311 – 340. doi:10.1006/jecp.1997.2384 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schnitzler, C. D. (2008). Phonologische Bewusstheit und Schriftspracherwerb [Phonological awareness and literacy development]. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seymor, P. H. H., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143 – 174. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shahar-Yames, D., & Share, D. L. (2008). Spelling as a self-teaching mechanism in orthographic learning. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 22 – 39. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00359.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151 – 218. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Share, D. L. (2008). On the anglocentrics of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier”orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584 – 615. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skowronek, H., & Marx, H. (1989). Die Bielefelder Längsschnittstudie zur Früherkennung von Risiken der Lese-Rechtschreibschwäche: Theoretischer Hintergrund und erste Befunde [The Bielefeld longitudinal study for the early diagnosis of dyslexia risk factors: Theoretical background and first results]. Heilpädagogische Forschung, 15, 38 – 49. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Snow, C. E. (2010). Reading comprehension: Reading for learning. In P. PetersonE. BakerB. McGawEds., International encyclopedia of education (pp. 413 – 418). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Spencer, L. H., & Hanley, J. R. (2003). Effects of orthographic transparency on reading and phoneme awareness in children learning to read in Wales. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 1 – 28. doi:10.1348/000712603762842075 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360 – 407. doi:10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sterling, T. D., Rosenbaum, W. L., & Weinkam, J. J. (1995). Publication decisions revisited: The effect of the outcome of statistical tests on the decision to publish and vice versa. The American Statistican, 49, 108 – 112. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Treiman, R., & Bourassa, D. C. (2000). The development of spelling skill. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(3), 1 – 18. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Treinies, G., Martschinke, S., Kirschhock, E.-M., & Frank, A. (1999). Die Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Erhebungsverfahrens zur phonologischen Bewußtheit im ersten Schuljahr [The development and evaluation of a phonological awareness test in 1st grade]. Nürnberg, Germany: Institut für Grundschulforschung. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Troost, J., Brunner, M., & Pröschel, U. (2004). Validität des Heidelberger Vorschulscreenings zur auditiv-kinästhetischen Wahrnehmung und Sprachverarbeitung [Validity of the Heidelberger Vorschulscreening (HVS)]. Diagnostica, 50, 193 – 201. doi:10.1026/0012-1924.50.4.193 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Vaessen, A., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Faísca, L., Reis, A., & Blomert, L. (2010). Cognitive development of fluent word reading does not qualitatively differ between transparent and opaque orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 827 – 842. doi:10.1037/a0019465 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192 – 212. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73 – 87. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.30.1.73 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilson, D. B. (2005). Meta-analysis macros for SAS, SPSS, and Stata (Version 2005.05.23). Retrieved from http://mason.gmu.edu/~dwilsonb/ma.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wimmer, H., Hartl, M., & Moser, E. (1990). Passen “englische” Modelle des Schriftspracherwerbs auf “deutsche” Kinder? Zweifel an der Bedeutsamkeit der logographischen Stufe [Are English models of literacy development valid for German children? Doubts concerning the significance of the logographic stage]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 22, 136 – 154. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wimmer, H., Landerl, K., Linortner, R., & Hummer, P. (1991). The relationship of phonemic awareness to reading acquisition: More consequence than precondition but still important. Cognition, 40, 219 – 249. doi:10.1016/0010-0277 (91)90026-Z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668 – 680. doi:10.10371/0022-0663.92.4.668 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • *Wimmer, H., Zwicker, T., & Gugg, D. (1991). Schwierigkeiten beim Lesen und Schreiben in den ersten Schuljahren: Befunde zur Persistenz und Verursachung [Persistence and causes of reading and writing difficulties in the first school years]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 280 – 298. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L., & … Blomert, L. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21, 551 – 559. doi:10.1177/0956797610363406 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3 – 29. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2006). Becoming literate in different languages: Similar problems, different solutions. Developmental Science, 9, 429 – 453. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00509.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar