What Does the Implicit Association Test Measure? A Test of the Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Prejudice-Related IATs
Abstract
Abstract. Drawing on recent criticism of the Implicit Association Test (IAT), the present study tested the convergent and discriminant validity of two prejudice-related IATs to corresponding explicit prejudice measures in a German student sample (N = 61). Confirming convergent validity, (a) an IAT designed to assess negative associations related to Turkish people was significantly related to the explicit endorsement of prejudiced beliefs about Turkish people, and (b) an IAT designed to assess negative associations related to East Asians was significantly related to explicit prejudice against East Asians. Moreover, confirming discriminant validity, (c) the Asian IAT was unrelated to the explicit endorsement of prejudiced beliefs about Turkish people, and (d) the Turkish IAT was unrelated to explicit prejudice against Asian people. These results further corroborate the assumption that the IAT is a valid method to assess the strength of evaluative associations in the domain of prejudice and stereotypes.
References
(1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing 421– 452 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2001). Implicit stereotypes and prejudice. In G. B. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology 359– 374 Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2001). Motivation zur Vorurteilskontrolle: Skaleneigenschaften und Validierung [Motivation to control prejudice: Scale properties and validation]. Manuscript submitted for publication.
(2001). Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 145– 160
(1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893– 912
(2001). How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 760– 773
(1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81– 105
(2001). Blatant and subtle prejudice: Dimensions, determinants, and consequences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 281– 297
(2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163– 170
(2000). Automatic preference for white Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 316– 328
(2001, September). Indirect measures of attitudes. Paper presented at the 3rd Meeting of the European Social Cognition Network, Houffalize, Belgium.
(1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5– 18
(2001). Implicit and explicit attitudes: Examination of the relationship between measures of intergroup bias. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes 175– 197 Malden, MA: Blackwell.
(1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316– 326
(1993). Variability in the likelihood of automatic attitude activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 753– 758
(1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013– 1027
(1999). The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology 97– 116 New York: Guilford Press.
(2001a). When do associations matter? The use of automatic associations toward ethnic groups in person judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 518– 524
(2001b). Der Einfluss wahrgenommener Bedrohung auf die Nutzung automatischer Assoziationen bei der Personenbeurteilung [The impact of perceived threat on the use of automatic associations in person judgments]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 32, 249– 259
(1999). Intentional control over prejudice: When the choice of measure matters. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 469– 477
(in press) It’s in the mind of the beholder: The impact of stereotypic associations on category-based and individuating impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
(2002b). Implicit bias in impression formation: Associations influence the construal of individuating information. Manuscript submitted for publication.
(2002a). Parallel context effects on implicit and explicit attitudes: Evidence for mutually independent processes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
(1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4– 27
(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464– 1480
(2001). DirectRT v2002. New York: Empirisoft.
(2001). LISREL 8.51. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
(1999). Eine Normierung unterschiedlicher Aspekte der evaluativen Bewertung von 92 Substantiven [A standardization of various aspects of the evaluation of 92 nouns]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 30, 1– 11
(2001). Heart versus reason in condom use: Implicit versus explicit predictors of sexual behavior. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 161– 175
(2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 435– 442
(2001). Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 107– 122
(2001). The structure of prejudice: Associative strength as a determinant of stereotype endorsement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 609– 620
(2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 625– 664
(2001). Implicit attitudes and racism: Effects of word familiarity and frequency of the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 19, 97– 144
(1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57– 75
(1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207– 231
(2001). Figure ground asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 94– 106
(1994). Zum emotionalen Gehalt von Substantiven, Adjektiven und Verben [The emotional meaning of nouns, adjectives, and verbs]. In W. Hager, & M. Hasselhorn (Eds.), Handbuch deutschsprachiger Wortnormen 272– 284 Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
(1992). Exemplar-based model of social judgment. Psychological Review, 99, 3– 21
(1992). Suppressor variables in multiple regression/correlation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 17– 28
(1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245– 251
(1992). The different routes to social judgments: Experiential versus informational strategies. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments 249– 275 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1983). The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(1992). Attitudes as temporary constructions. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments 37– 65 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationships with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 262– 274
(1997). Vorurteile und Rassismus. Eine sozialpsychologische Analyse. [Prejudice and racism: A social psychological analysis]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
